Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8C0C002D for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 04:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C2860B6B for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 04:28:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org B7C2860B6B X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oob0h2l0NieV for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 04:28:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 7EB1060768 Received: from mail-ua1-f42.google.com (mail-ua1-f42.google.com [209.85.222.42]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EB1060768 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 04:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua1-f42.google.com with SMTP id w22so2529560uau.7 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:28:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BPECFVgBOb81yaQvDEqmWg6VXR/3WOmOb0pZpXHkRVM=; b=6zdSdIpBueqIDY8YcygexzMVUO378/jq6LDolkYv5PrdkRvp3qb22hzIofdO2ntLh6 lRLDMWgXRkIlQCZE+YUUYoJvgIj3vBqPdfl1ivhcSpFo38kF5bSTogON254UVHr/z7l9 bXnfRvhQapdyK+RMTMg/600dvMfFXjYbMLwr7lGqa+cdtjkvxDH6S4d8VI3M3lIYbbQV PEzWQjqgJ86227qWQleks7ipyk9P10spJOEFZDiNFH7Wc6CX8cw3KzlbzfMjF3zZXOY2 xajAX6pjCxK5O8mQUjxYCTAJXUSju++DyQOoL+KZ9FBoJMblLIZuWj7+2VJUO8v7DbKV PBxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+rE94DcOiX730Y/AMASE68MK4pP24Z1P8yZLtrcUET4Tntyjkm eYCJuRYgzxZBTG1grV14y3OCFV1cV8rNeZuv1chZCt1HsVqDJdy1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1usKXhh4WNFMpdDpLZAlD3riCXzyBnl8LJUTmqGZVmJ4m6zHPb42ScjRmvbik9FN1fdUUx9KjXIpIhTdKxvhmU= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:614e:0:b0:384:726c:6fa7 with SMTP id w14-20020ab0614e000000b00384726c6fa7mr999952uan.119.1658550524656; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:28:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7QoRGux2ow375UP6-XXIF6kI_0tbt-RxKrXiyuDBWVWh6Shjia-ShKy_or5FK9u46KkPAvK2biaSe_x8fMWP0Q==@protonmail.internalid> <20220719104725.ppic7jy4ghfieeap@artanis> In-Reply-To: From: Ryan Grant Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 04:28:08 +0000 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Peter Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Trying all address types in message signing verification (BIP) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 04:28:47 -0000 On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:46 PM Peter (Coinkite Inc) via bitcoin-dev wrote: > [...] the various BIP-322 proposals never gained wide acceptance. There's renewed interest in using BIP322 to validate signatures related to work upgrading the Bitcoin-native Decentralized Identifier Method (did:btcr) beyond its current specification, to version 2.0. https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot11-the-hague/blob/master/advance-readings/bip322-signature-suite.md https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/