Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of
	national.shitposting.agency designates 75.102.27.230 as
	permitted sender) client-ip=75.102.27.230;
	envelope-from=insecurity@national.shitposting.agency;
	helo=mail.cock.li; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:10:09 +0000
From: insecurity@national.shitposting.agency
To: pete@petertodd.org
In-Reply-To: <20150511103402.GA21748@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <55505441.3010906@certimix.com>
	<20150511103402.GA21748@savin.petertodd.org>
Message-ID: <66648462658adebb5e5be7fcba65e670@national.shitposting.agency>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reducing the block rate instead of
 increasing the maximum block size
Precedence: list

On 2015-05-11 10:34, Peter Todd wrote:
> How do you see that blacklisting actually being done?

Same way ghash.io was banned from the network when used Finney attacks
against BetCoin Dice.

As Andreas Antonopoulos says, if any of the miners do anything bad, we
just ban them from mining. Any sort of attack like this only lasts 10
minutes as a result. Stop worrying so much.

https://youtu.be/ncPyMUfNyVM?t=20s