Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R4IWS-0005E3-EW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:27:00 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1R4IWR-00044v-K6 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:27:00 +0000 Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so1688356gxk.5 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.174.18 with SMTP id b18mr1406885anp.75.1316111787196; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-64-101-226-210.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-226-210.cisco.com [64.101.226.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k12sm17075675anc.19.2011.09.15.11.36.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5D42AD25-BB7A-4D5F-9395-09DC774ADDF9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 From: Douglas Huff In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:36:20 -0500 Message-Id: <402A5924-1950-4455-9DCA-5C49570FDC73@jrbobdobbs.org> References: <201109142206.40455.luke@dashjr.org> <4E71F5F8.2020807@jerviss.org> <201109151136.47485.luke@dashjr.org> To: Bitcoin Dev Development X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1R4IWR-00044v-K6 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request review: drop misbehaving peers X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:27:00 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_5D42AD25-BB7A-4D5F-9395-09DC774ADDF9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: >> On Sep 15, 2011 11:20 AM, "Gavin Andresen" = wrote: >>> I'm ignoring bandwidth DoS attacks-- we already have the >>> -maxreceivebuffer option to deal with those. >>=20 >> I disagree with this comment. The way this is currently implemented = is a mem >> exhaustion dos in itself waiting to happen and does nothing to = prevent >> network flooding. >=20 > Have you submitted a patch to fix it? No, it requires the entirety of the p2p network code be reworked and = large patches aren't accepted. No reason to take that off list, it's an issue that's been acknowledged = on irc numerous times and is in the public channel logs. --=20 Douglas Huff= --Apple-Mail=_5D42AD25-BB7A-4D5F-9395-09DC774ADDF9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOckWkAAoJEEPHkQabDWHP3QAP/3xJ6o8pejAEXdg2K0tzDd2/ pMW66xTWU/0Ym+oDfrfCcmTTyXS6LdAEhwvK0/MPBFjhz5nYGxmMM2lrfdB4Dm8d Sg7inOAhdF5TCiwWJJ8Pop6PNrzdP6AJIxqYAFIpXHHsrcBLjVdIiNJM7HOU67xT XjOT7HepQlMwahG24r3AxN/7f+duwbHf1Nh5IPRoeJo2Wtna7NKc1JhfHMO8R/CK PIkGdL0ZhGeZryIeZQYGuRnZkB7dBUvc6AnSnEKWnBDtetZFxND3xQ492wcJWyB7 RUhe9kZ1xB/2DUVH3RpTyKFxVInfZfYNy3W9rX2tS6nEo/dNB68G+hqshngufpH9 JNMQoK39Nd41yoPUihaAIOTc0pNQYNsze9WOwmeHGrr32p5KsFqfA3qrUpw4xTpA 6A9Q3NAjrhBadRjD0OZ1WKeI9GAV2vpxlfDrjM/vOl5xE5dd25vips6wHqTTNLOa Ahy/r1CnK6gH9tA6M7pm/rQHgO31PNtkzAIhOohqVvIGzAzBDlxKpiDAmfyMzFQa p+qBaqmRYRlrkI5aCMY6/J1DkLrspr/hdQ/i2SzN5XPYctX74XjuEbEXFbU+YVkx RdeSk514mASrd+B5U9f894k6enoKhzd6+P+KsbR3KwCf90yjC3+11zFraV5NWp5F KDj3FQAqSLht22uflArI =WO34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_5D42AD25-BB7A-4D5F-9395-09DC774ADDF9--