Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Vpo8F-0002Hx-Ol for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 23:51:27 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of mm.st designates 66.111.4.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.111.4.28; envelope-from=theymos@mm.st; helo=out4-smtp.messagingengine.com; Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1Vpo8E-0004g5-AB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 23:51:27 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF21D20719 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:51:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:51:20 -0500 Received: by web6.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 92339291618; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:51:20 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1386546680.28932.57095933.29430EA8@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: twU0rFZT0a3VkNUugMnYQF3ACRpflhq7efEiOzvTIBkI 1386546680 From: theymos To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_1386546680289320"; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-c99dcdd8 Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:51:20 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <52A3C8A5.7010606@gmail.com> <201312082101.25609.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: bitcoin.org] -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (theymos[at]mm.st) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Vpo8E-0004g5-AB Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org, your thoughts? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 23:51:28 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_----------=_1386546680289320 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain On Sun, Dec 8, 2013, at 03:11 PM, Drak wrote: It's not just about trust, there is the robustness factor: what if he becomes sick, unavailable, hit by a bus? Others need the ability to pickup and run with it. The control over the domain (including ability to renew registration, alter nameservers) needs to be with more than one person. That's why I suggest using the same people who have control over the software project at sf,github The bitcoin.org domain is controlled by me, Sirius, and an anonymous person. Control will not be lost if Sirius becomes unavailable. SSL is probably a good idea, and it's probably also a good idea to separate bitcoin.org from Github. I don't know that I trust Github. I'm sure that you can find a sponsor for a dedicated server. Let us know if DNS changes to bitcoin.org are required. --_----------=_1386546680289320 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013, at 03:11 PM, Drak wrote:
It's not just about trust, there is the robustness factor: what if he becomes sick, unavailable, hit by a bus? Others need the ability to pickup and run with it. The control over the domain (including ability to renew registration, alter nameservers) needs to be with more than one person. That's why I suggest using the same people who have control over the software project at sf,github
 
The bitcoin.org domain is controlled by me, Sirius, and an anonymous person. Control will not be lost if Sirius becomes unavailable.
 
SSL is probably a good idea, and it's probably also a good idea to separate bitcoin.org from Github. I don't know that I trust Github. I'm sure that you can find a sponsor for a dedicated server. Let us know if DNS changes to bitcoin.org are required.
--_----------=_1386546680289320--