Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56FE83D for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:58:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:06 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from c.spam.sonic.net (c.spam.sonic.net [69.12.221.230]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC93AEE for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from d.mail.sonic.net (b.spam-proxy.sonic.net [69.12.208.80]) by c.spam.sonic.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1Q7om9A010818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:50:48 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.190] (63.135.62.197.nwinternet.com [63.135.62.197] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by d.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u1Q7ogpn008413 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:50:43 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D5F1A676-1F24-41C2-A7F5-72B0CF2D4E9B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2 From: Jonathan Toomim In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:50:41 -0800 Message-Id: <05C32A45-2EE8-4808-A0C6-18B1C30A8E1C@toom.im> References: To: Gregory Maxwell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVYfK7RcVyBwOqZVYImcmDXVFG8sHrk0yNu29xjgrAs7jj6Mic66R5ezO445mYPTYkfqoqgyWYHKBwnncXFKuLof X-Sonic-ID: C;NKHFol3c5RGQLk0iDwNmVA== M;8BM8o13c5RGQLk0iDwNmVA== X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] INV overhead and batched INVs to reduce full node traffic X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:58:59 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_D5F1A676-1F24-41C2-A7F5-72B0CF2D4E9B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On Feb 25, 2016, at 9:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > The batching was > temporarily somewhat hobbled between 0.10 and 0.12 (especially when > you had any abusive frequently pinging peers attached), but is now > fully functional again and it now manages to batch many transactions > per INV pretty effectively. T Thanks for the response. I've been mostly using and working on = 0.11-series versions, which very rarely send out INV batches. In my = examination, about 85% of the packets had a single hash in it. Nice to = know this is one of the other improvements in 0.12. --Apple-Mail=_D5F1A676-1F24-41C2-A7F5-72B0CF2D4E9B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJW0APSAAoJEIEuMk4MG0P148gH/jDcWwV9wjaDul698cS3sYAR WxZl7C0C3tyjdh7d1wxVtRw/YH1EMt1FPMPIElp+UoIYMVwNsdUqKaWSaqaHhMd2 Dn5luiSoD0myP4cKqnj3X5UNSFvNjly1pTtwassYFQmrhUw8EwZk8L5jFyDJldtz lZlmjN+lnBITFysVadZsm2bBiKv+Ao1PUm6y/JV75+r3+lUe9LAzf7zJSg2iWq7z 0hD3gu7MLGA1ZbwxASHveIEXm7FASLp59iAJG7zmQbivHzJ8igkpsOylK65/5g2i 6pdgp0+mS9/7+cMMD5inK8iK5F12ucIeGB6oXl7OIQhE3Q3U6YraDps2qph77KI= =XUwa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_D5F1A676-1F24-41C2-A7F5-72B0CF2D4E9B--