Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WLkKj-0003Am-8t for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 02:16:21 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.53; envelope-from=swansontec@gmail.com; helo=mail-yh0-f53.google.com; Received: from mail-yh0-f53.google.com ([209.85.213.53]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WLkKh-0006sk-HV for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 02:16:21 +0000 Received: by mail-yh0-f53.google.com with SMTP id i57so670255yha.12 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:16:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.141.242 with SMTP id g78mr19609037yhj.50.1394158574077; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:16:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.98.135 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:16:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:16:14 -0800 Message-ID: From: William Swanson To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (swansontec[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WLkKh-0006sk-HV Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bip-0021 and bip-0072 ambiguities & mistakes X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 02:16:21 -0000 On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: > Yes please, pull req would be great! I also noticed that escaping doesn't > seem to be necessary, and the resultant de-escaped QRcodes are certainly > much nicer! Thanks! All right, I have submitted the pull request. Hopefully, the specified behavior now corresponds more closely to what the bitcoin-qt client is actually doing, and to what the RFC recommends. -William