Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WwnkM-0002F5-OS for Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:23:58 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.148.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.148.99; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail148099.authsmtp.net; Received: from outmail148099.authsmtp.net ([62.13.148.99]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1WwnkK-0007er-LA for Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:23:58 +0000 Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s5H7NoX2037428 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:23:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s5H7Niss068410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:23:46 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 03:23:51 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20140617072351.GA7205@savin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: 523d3ea8-f5f0-11e3-b396-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVBwpGK10IU0Fd P1hXKl1LNVAaWXld WiVPGEoXDxgzCjYj NEgGOBsDNw4AXgJ1 Kg0XXVBSFQF4ARQL BB0UVh48cANYeX5u ZEFqQHFbVVt/fUFi QwAXEBUBGz4jK2AZ WERZd01QeQVIMBpH aQR8ASIFfDMCMHp9 RlY+ZHU7ZmQBbXwN GFxcdVtLHEoCQSgE XRcaGi4mGR9NTiE3 KBcvNlNUTA4KP18s MFAsEVgZLwRaBApE V0xdGCJDJlwMQTYi CUtHRkN2 X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.13.148.99 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1WwnkK-0007er-LA Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:23:58 -0000 --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For my replace-by-fee implementation(1) I used service bit 26 to let preferential peering work so that replace-by-fee nodes could easily find each other. Of course, that's a temporary/experimental usage that can be dropped after wider adoption, so I included the following comment: // Reserve 24-31 for temporary experiments NODE_REPLACE_BY_FEE =3D (1 << 26) Service bits are never a guaranteed thing anyway, so occasional collisions can and should be tolerated by applications using these experimental service bits. Alternately Wladimir J. van der Laan brought up elsewhere(2) the possibility for a wider notion of an extension namespace. I'm personally not convinced of the short-term need - we've got 64 service bits yet NODE_BLOOM is the first fully fleshed out proposal to use one - but it's worth thinking about for the long term. 1) https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/tree/replace-by-fee-v0.9.1 2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4351#issuecomment-46272958 --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 000000000000000058ca7ee3a40438ea5a96e499910638352468c6d69abdb226 --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQGrBAEBCACVBQJTn+0EXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDA1OGNhN2VlM2E0MDQzOGVhNWE5NmU0OTk5MTA2MzgzNTI0 NjhjNmQ2OWFiZGIyMjYvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkfu8lgf/eNA3o7PHVKRoKxSLNPTTP9cm PW9BrbRuDFwkHAtpZHF/ynFauKJA3KPiY6B9txiaPyoofXEa+G5qar4Q3VmUtECD DHc9yUKx6U+sMhQFMc+l4/IV8bKELvlR7+3S0O045wuFkdmkgGXs+30+1b33fp7a hmC15AyWlaCkRyfqUh7yINm3CjLej1xrKYeHj50MaWbelRrJ8qxU7KUF29LT66vD bPUP+Orvx2/qqV7Hzhjd8xDkxBW45VdGH/kKIq7YqCpleFVGkDHwhkTNjdDZOHpV VAX8IdFDBwkBlTJlNKR9ulgJ43FdVKYMd+KekhMWTDuelchZb7YQ9WAvECI3cw== =1z8P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--