Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org>) id 1YEEFL-0003Do-Rn for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:40:15 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; envelope-from=gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org; helo=plane.gmane.org; Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1YEEFH-00056l-B8 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:40:15 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org>) id 1YEEFA-0005bf-D3 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:40:04 +0100 Received: from ip4d151d66.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.21.29.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:40:04 +0100 Received: from for-gmane by ip4d151d66.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:40:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net From: "U.Mutlu" <for-gmane@mutluit.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:36:23 +0100 Organization: mutluit.com Message-ID: <m9qgan$bk1$1@ger.gmane.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip4d151d66.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24 X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1YEEFH-00056l-B8 Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Securing wallet on paper X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:40:16 -0000 I don't know yet the details of how a wallet looks like internally, but I think it should be possible to print the wallet incl. acct nbr out on classical paper (as base16 or base64 etc.) for filing it in a physical home or bank safe. Later, typing it from paper to a small converter program that recreates the wallet file. IMO this is a good security against possible computer hardware disasters. Of course one has to secure this further with encryption against bank fraud/theft etc. Ie. the output on paper should be encrypted, and the owner should place the key somewhere else. I would suggest the developers make such functionality available for the user. cu Uenal