Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
	designates 208.79.240.5 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=208.79.240.5; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me;
	helo=smtpauth.rollernet.us; 
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <201107101846.09997.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <BANLkTinus7PWNLJi9rEvTtSB93hjLKhFpg@mail.gmail.com>
	<201107101630.55518.luke@dashjr.org>
	<1310335963.2230.29.camel@Desktop666>
	<201107101846.09997.luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-wWlcFU2NYBiQ6YVrY4E0"
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:58:30 +0200
Message-ID: <1310338710.2230.30.camel@Desktop666>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Useful bitcoin patches...
Precedence: list


--=-wWlcFU2NYBiQ6YVrY4E0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 18:46 -0400, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Sunday, July 10, 2011 6:12:43 PM Matt Corallo wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 16:30 -0400, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > > Again, take it or leave it, but in the meantime you're asking for tro=
uble
> > > from users who feel they're being forced to pay more than they have t=
o.
> > > Or perhaps rather than trouble, that decision will increase awareness=
 of
> > > other clients that don't try to control the users. That could be good
> > > too.
> >=20
> > Its not a question of forcing users to pay anything, its a question of
> > how best to solve the "Im just gonna throw random crap in the chain for
> > the lulz" problem without causing too many side effects.  As with many
> > things Bitcoin, the temporary solution was something that was fairly
> > quickly hacked together to solve the problem without causing too many
> > problems.  What needs to happen is an actual solution, Bitcoin, in
> > theory, allows for all kinds of cool things, but the solution here need=
s
> > carefully thought out and implemented, not just keep lowering the fees.
>=20
> The point is that we are already accepting lower fees. People (probably) =
want=20
> to pay those lower fees. Yet there's developers writing their software to=
 get=20
> in the way between the user and pool willing to do business.
Read what I wrote again, and don't reply off-list.

--=-wWlcFU2NYBiQ6YVrY4E0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOGi6QAAoJEBrh01BD4I5UiXgQAJHn1nW4FLF10D9f+SRdp07M
BFQTl0ejjUVve+hNmvgdDL+2hCyCtXPsPnwULgDaH7VP5bBR4oDZ3G/FIZL3Xf5b
jRl+VpItUb6JoZAonxoZDoXNtM+Q6L/r7mq9PV0p9rv9S2VphQvLAvclGhBeEE7G
HHoNnw7JC3pT1D+bWX8CwsG4mIQa9iQ404044csJLTQl2d5OCShH38aIVr2jRboN
Di79Krato7DHxjdSTkOCWiCykyzEOJL7DF/phw27ybua06VdaH3yzSitACXInTXq
n0rof7h+VLfi6vmhAGuEL9Vdyg8MDcwBmYFL+GAYKnM3g0TYXLWOWLGpOMAvquYL
st3jPInXyuIxZ+az/XxqyUlOQTTpmOkJ2Ly7Ze9VmbRlYdYs1yG4PESqF/xhl3On
RWa+CKs4WTeQBBvYP0mROsljYU/bH541NJKOlTZG6OBaDs4qcuB5M+BHLGkyGVGU
mKMg6PVAuP6LMIQDQDKC5hxXY3MEWdhZEISVg/tPrxu24ClHNPIminaH/fYzyIFf
J0iPKDPfoUtu1hl/nV6BwZfQWmxO+5J8lWsy7Tc4N/vPG8sXj6S983kgxxgqfxLz
qyK1RGANctyOQx1Qj3C6TbxX4aKC7B61dpVwoighAZ5gjFjvF1TGE+BylSDRhVB9
Hah57PJlarsCXiB5nVAS
=KRzQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-wWlcFU2NYBiQ6YVrY4E0--