Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <witchspace81@gmail.com>) id 1Qovbc-0001kU-F2
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:56:48 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.160.175; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-gy0-f175.google.com; 
Received: from mail-gy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Qovbb-0001Es-IL
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:56:48 +0000
Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so880738gyg.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.114.2 with SMTP id m2mr1853626ybc.3.1312455402039; Thu, 04
	Aug 2011 03:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.52.5 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 03:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 10:56:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJNQ0svWgFwZrra0gQFpxNLOPXk4RbKygeMUNPEA=k-Wqwa-ZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd48bc605a92c04a9abd6bc
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
	digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Qovbb-0001Es-IL
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Blitcoin? (Black Hat 2011)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:56:48 -0000

--000e0cd48bc605a92c04a9abd6bc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

L.S.

Some bitcoin "security vulnerabilities" have been discussed by Dan Kaminsky
at BH 2011, there is one article about this dated yesterday:

http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/2240039221/Black-Hat-2011-Dan-Kaminsky-reveals-network-security-research-topics

The article is very unspecific though. They talk about a tool called
"blitcoin" that "unmasks" both sides of a bitcoin transaction. A google
search also turned up nothing, except some misspellings.

Does anyone have more information?

JS

--000e0cd48bc605a92c04a9abd6bc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

L.S.<br><br>Some bitcoin &quot;security vulnerabilities&quot; have been dis=
cussed by Dan Kaminsky at BH 2011, there is one article about this dated ye=
sterday:<br><br><a href=3D"http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/224003=
9221/Black-Hat-2011-Dan-Kaminsky-reveals-network-security-research-topics">=
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/2240039221/Black-Hat-2011-Dan-Kam=
insky-reveals-network-security-research-topics</a><br>
<br>The article is very unspecific though. They talk about a tool called &q=
uot;blitcoin&quot; that &quot;unmasks&quot; both sides of a bitcoin transac=
tion. A google search also turned up nothing, except some misspellings. <br=
>
<br>Does anyone have more information?<br><br>JS<br>

--000e0cd48bc605a92c04a9abd6bc--