Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34E1305 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:03:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pf1-f170.google.com (mail-pf1-f170.google.com [209.85.210.170]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32F85773 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f170.google.com with SMTP id d4-v6so3453275pfn.0 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sjpV6g/EMinMjj3wgPUPHNLH/nwZqI38X+dEAc3E4l8=; b=F+WspAu6TrfM5VVDD5d7s64N1O6b0kxJMNAl+9ecA+gScp4NbOXDFP3F5nzKchiVAh gVLrMuXF42btfYFQdx+cnpJQGNmNkavz9mmx8fdChIh767/U0bvMCmxI6niEVRoXJPDR GZYEC1RgYDS5UvQeAjqx+4FtB4lC85ewI915ua7RBX9qb9LG+9bQ+8L6FJc4hQsAU3aP YDhq+zB8djJr92ki2RXsGDt5/rTHFpn7CE2WA9sLNzcM1eJUSfxvGvgEr1AfVt7oa1ft LukOeBY0GCIs9WZrEfvkogtmy0lPMAxCYBNvu8v6sUSSSSM1eK0XTHOlSiViLDb8sh9q KTFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sjpV6g/EMinMjj3wgPUPHNLH/nwZqI38X+dEAc3E4l8=; b=o/mAi4K+NcgUz3cBBbsEco9ICaQlLu+fwMvTeQseGVVBLgV9n8sCuqBHSBN7E4CW4H EM3q3N2z7bCtMaF32DFK3wh0WrA86nzF84gceKkUBgqRgDtsI3o6MVanzWgTNqqfZHfk QJst6gCPmmGAeeWfhm2RprRvQYOw1ldWmBiERPI6p4C8OOiY0sgvxlOMuYCnwrxecCc+ CmgU5b4I22nixCoWiNiwiZOyVnP5pp0PUYzsFMNgLduQ72IIQnkV/GuX8q/yraVvNFJP QQ57UjCnihCmKV6btfzbp29MfnU5Ll9duVkIffcdl7+zLqbQS2IOsehdxz4buhyUn22C cnwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogsWhT9ukX5652fVaeMQEyq4t/17AhhHOyDtOR+9KcAYEfvD2V3 ArXkyC1zL8b7fsQeccR0wpw37itpmU7cub4ytKkb/AHF X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63k8XFipOBMX/q4fxux0MAa+6HOv+Bd4Y/iSz8sd5Nq7POu+I/jizEzLtnxaAAysdkvqqig5xS1vszQldjziTk= X-Received: by 2002:a62:e70a:: with SMTP id s10-v6mr6983790pfh.124.1538661830365; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:03:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?B?44GK44Gu44GL44Gh44GK?= Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 23:03:37 +0900 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d417ec0577679fa5" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 22:51:51 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] MultiSig request URI proposal X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:03:51 -0000 --000000000000d417ec0577679fa5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi. I have an idea that subject. There are already BIP 21. But Multisig request URI is non exist. My idea is below: bitcoin-sigreq://{{rawtx}}?{{param}} rawtx: raw transaction (encoded by base64) param: - pubkey={{public key for sign key pair}} - hd_wallet_position={{path for HD wallet position}} This URI scheme is used for multisig request from website to user's local wallet. How do you think ? --000000000000d417ec0577679fa5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi.

I have an idea that subject.
<= div>
There are already BIP 21.
But Multisig request= URI is non exist.

My idea is below:
bitcoin-sigreq://{{rawtx}}?{{param}}

r= awtx: raw transaction (encoded by base64)
param:
- pubk= ey=3D{{public key for sign key pair}}
- hd_wallet_position=3D{{pa= th for HD wallet position}}

This URI scheme is use= d for multisig request from website to user's local wallet.
<= br>
How do you think ?
--000000000000d417ec0577679fa5--