Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Whadr-0001LZ-GB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 06 May 2014 08:22:23 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.177; envelope-from=alonmuroch@gmail.com; helo=mail-we0-f177.google.com; Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Whadp-00074d-VY for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 06 May 2014 08:22:23 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x48so3232215wes.22 for ; Tue, 06 May 2014 01:22:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.92.228 with SMTP id cp4mr75126wjb.81.1399364535771; Tue, 06 May 2014 01:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.109.100 with HTTP; Tue, 6 May 2014 01:22:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <70790f686997e51d680e9bde0c9d5a3e.squirrel@fulvetta.riseup.net> References: <5303B110.70603@bitpay.com> <70790f686997e51d680e9bde0c9d5a3e.squirrel@fulvetta.riseup.net> Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 10:22:15 +0200 Message-ID: From: Alon Muroch To: Odinn Cyberguerrilla Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfd0bde10e70d04f8b6f265 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (alonmuroch[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Whadp-00074d-VY Cc: Bitcoin Dev , Andreas Schildbach Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70 proposed changes X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 08:22:23 -0000 --047d7bfd0bde10e70d04f8b6f265 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Odinn, There is a tromendous progress and we are working hard on the 2 factor auth. You an follow our progress at : https://github.com/cpacia/BitcoinAuthenticator We are still at development and there is a lot to be done :) On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Odinn Cyberguerrilla < odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> wrote: > I am curious if the Android developer who had been working on two factor > authentication and bitcoin had worked toward an open issue or pull > request? I had been looking around for some sign that this had occurred > but hadn't found it, I am interested to know what is the progress in this > area (in a fully decentralized way that resides fully on one's device or > devices). > > For some reason maidsafe keeps rising up in my brain, have bitcoin core > developers touched bases with maidsafe developers on these kind of fine > points? > > Just thoughts and questions. > > -Odinn > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Andreas Schildbach > > wrote: > >> On 02/18/2014 08:14 PM, Ryan X. Charles wrote: > >>> BitPay is working on a new standard > >>> based on bitcoin-like addresses for authentication. It would be great > >>> if > >>> we could work with the community to establish a complete, decentralized > >>> authentication protocol. > >> > >> Sounds interesting, let us know as soon as you have anything. > > > > SINs. See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Identity_protocol_v1 > > > > -- > > Jeff Garzik > > Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist > > BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications > > Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. > > Read the Whitepaper. > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > _______________________________________________ > > Bitcoin-development mailing list > > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find > out: > • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity > • Requirements for releasing software faster > • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > --047d7bfd0bde10e70d04f8b6f265 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi=C2=A0Odinn,
There is a = tromendous progress and we are working hard on the 2 factor auth.=C2=A0
You an follow our progress at :

We are sti= ll at development and there is a lot to be done :)=C2=A0


On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Odinn Cy= berguerrilla <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>= wrote:
I am curious if the Android developer who ha= d been working on two factor
authentication and bitcoin had worked toward an open issue or pull
request? =C2=A0I had been looking around for some sign that this had occurr= ed
but hadn't found it, I am interested to know what is the progress in th= is
area (in a fully decentralized way that resides fully on one's device o= r
devices).

For some reason maidsafe keeps rising up in my brain, have bitcoin core
developers touched bases with maidsafe developers on these kind of fine
points?

Just thoughts and questions.

-Odinn

> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Andreas Schildbach
> <andreas@schildbach.de= > wrote:
>> On 02/18/2014 08:14 PM, Ryan X. Charles wrote:
>>> BitPay is working on a new standard
>>> based on bitcoin-like addresses for authentication. It would b= e great
>>> if
>>> we could work with the community to establish a complete, dece= ntralized
>>> authentication protocol.
>>
>> Sounds interesting, let us know as soon as you have anything.
>
> SINs. =C2=A0See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Identity_protocol_v1=
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
> BitPay, Inc. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0https://bitpay.com/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------= --------
> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.=
> Read the Whitepaper.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.ne= t/gampad/clk?id=3D121054471&iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-d= evelopment@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitco= in-development
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out= :
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/= sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment

--047d7bfd0bde10e70d04f8b6f265--