Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4qzX-0000sv-BB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:33:27 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.148.114 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.148.114; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail148114.authsmtp.net; Received: from outmail148114.authsmtp.net ([62.13.148.114]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Z4qzV-0006fS-AB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:33:27 +0000 Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt16.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5GDXCYa019419; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:33:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from muck ([85.255.233.40]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5GDX3It035273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:33:07 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:33:05 +0100 From: Peter Todd To: Pindar Wong Message-ID: <20150616133305.GA30988@muck> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Server-Quench: 398d300c-142c-11e5-b396-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR bwdMdwQUEkAaAgsB AmMbWlBeU157WWs7 Yw9PbwBYfEhNXBtu UFdMSlVNFUssBGt1 bh1nFhlxcgdBezBy YU9iXj5YVUwudkZ9 EVNVEW9VeGZhPWUC AkNRcR5UcAFPdx8U a1UrBXRDAzANdhES HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA4SAzMn WxEFGy5nFEcCWjl7 JR06IVkdGgMhDg05 NlcsEVwfKRxaRG8W GUZLRSReIUIMQTE2 FktaVFQSVTNaWyQ0 X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 85.255.233.40/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1Z4qzV-0006fS-AB Cc: Constance Choi , Bitcoin Dev , Primavera De Filippi Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:33:27 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:33:31PM +0800, Pindar Wong wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Adam Back wrote: > Dear Adam, All: >=20 > At the community's convenience, it would be an honour to arrange an initi= al > open summit to meet with representatives of the Chinese miners in Hong Ko= ng > (UTC+8) to facilitate a better understand between the different > stakeholders of the Bitcoin ecosystem on this important issue. This cou= ld > be arranged for this October, or earlier, if deemed necessary. Great! FWIW there Constance Choi and Primavera De Filippi (CC'd) are holding a blockchain-tech conference October 14th-15th in Hong Kong as well; coordinating your summit with that conference could be useful. http://blockchainworkshops.org/ This workshop series has been attracting audiences of people looking to use blockchain tech in general; many of these use-cases will likely involve the Bitcoin blockchain in unpredictable ways. Importantly, these ways can drive demand significantly beyond our current assumptions based on most demand being consumer-merchant transactions. In addition, many of the attendees have significant experience with regulatory issues and interacting with governments on regulation of blockchain tech. Bitcoin faces existential risks to its existence by these regulation efforts, which include things like efforts to setup industry wide Anti-Money-Laundering/Know-Your-Customer programs, including programs that would tie on-chain transactions to identity information. Any blocksize discussion needs to be informed by these potential threats to usage of the technology, as well as challenges to using scaling solutions. > Remote online participation would be welcome from those who might not be > able to attend in person. >=20 > However, it is hoped that such a meeting would be primarily document > driven to facilitate orderly translation, discussion and decision. Agreed. Pieter Wuille's recent work is a great example of the kind of science-driven investigations that need to be done - and haven't been done very much - to get us some hard data to make decisions on. --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 0000000000000000127ab1d576dc851f374424f1269c4700ccaba2c42d97e778 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJVgCWOXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAxMjdhYjFkNTc2ZGM4NTFmMzc0NDI0ZjEyNjljNDcwMGNj YWJhMmM0MmQ5N2U3NzgvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQwIXyHOf0udyaFAf5AY55acF/RhR+/krGwQ4NUmy5 5Yu2MEyBE2j937o8dfY3hDThCTRevgCXpLcjItuQNPIQWQo1ANVqgbZpfSr05QUc OEkHgkzP9hurrB7u38COvRuNkY85Hofh+Tax6u99DaB1dSN7Ot7OiZxLOqxdmLQI CCU7nr5NH27nQIsT+BJAXmaRYytSnMN4p63eYrS7dAjArNFptMxFF98RuYuWWKkE vyW+ohBpvDhchd5lGL3o+gPYGkrx5Rm91+mRgcQeEbBV4dVLAtmZOoZP1Tc+L+0G s/Qxqu0nqPuGK1bvwMASGNXMulkE0YHEiVc5MSF/mGrWTyfpXktO4snaoJiIHw== =Bw4e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--