Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WJFwx-0007QR-NH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:25:31 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from nl.grid.coop ([50.7.166.116]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1WJFww-0006Ph-FG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:25:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nl.grid.coop with local; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 23:25:23 -0600 id 000000000006A340.0000000053101DC3.00005828 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 23:25:23 -0600 From: Troy Benjegerdes To: Mark Friedenbach Message-ID: <20140228052523.GO3180@nl.grid.coop> References: <530B8000.1070801@monetize.io> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <530B8000.1070801@monetize.io> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1WJFww-0006Ph-FG Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:25:31 -0000 To each his own, but if I say "Please don't charge me for YOUR privacy by putting junk like stealth addresses in the blockchain", I think I'd get laughed out of most rooms. Either the transaction fees are sufficient to pay the cost for whatever random junk anyone wants to put there, or they are not, and if they are not, then I suggest you re-think the fee structure rather than trying to pre-regulate me putting 80 character pithy quotes in the blockhain. On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:23:12AM -0800, Mark Friedenbach wrote: > Given our standardization on 128-bit security / 256-bit primitives, I > can't think of any crypto related data payload which requires more than > 40 bytes. Even DER encoded compressed public keys will fit in there. A > signature won't fit, but why would you need one in there? > > There's no need to design for 64-byte hashes, and the 80-char line > length comparison is a good point. As an Engineer I'd want to have a > little more room as a 32-byte hash or EC point + 8 bytes identifying > prefix data is the bare minimum, but it is also very important that we > send a message: This is for payment related applications like stealth > addresses only. Don't burden everybody by putting your junk on the block > chain. > > On 02/24/2014 08:39 AM, Wladimir wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Garzik > > wrote: > > > > A common IRC proposal seems to lean towards reducing that from 80. > > I'll leave it to the crowd to argue about size from there. I do think > > regular transactions should have the ability to include some metadata. > > > > > > I'd be in favor of bringing it down to 40 for 0.9. > > > > That'd be enough for <8 byte header/identifier><32 byte hash>. > > > > 80, as the standard line length, is almost asking for "insert your > > graffiti message here". I also see no need for 64 bytes hashes such as > > SHA512 in the context of bitcoin, as that only offers 256-bit security > > (at most) in the first place. > > > > And if this is not abused, these kind of transactions become popular, > > and more space is really needed, the limit can always be increased in a > > future version. > > > > Wladimir > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. > > Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer > > Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. > > Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bitcoin-development mailing list > > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. > Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer > Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. > Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' hozer@hozed.org 7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul grid.coop Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel, nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash