Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YqQ9m-00027l-7o for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 07 May 2015 18:04:22 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.47; envelope-from=btcdrak@gmail.com; helo=mail-vn0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-vn0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YqQ9l-0002EY-I3 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 07 May 2015 18:04:22 +0000 Received: by vnbg129 with SMTP id g129so3716954vnb.4 for ; Thu, 07 May 2015 11:04:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.26.132 with SMTP id l4mr3916414vdg.72.1431021856083; Thu, 07 May 2015 11:04:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.63.5 with HTTP; Thu, 7 May 2015 11:03:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <554A91BE.6060105@bluematt.me> <554BA032.4040405@bluematt.me> From: Btc Drak Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 19:03:55 +0100 Message-ID: To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307c9fb065d512051581bdc6 X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 HK_RANDOM_FROM From username looks random -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.6 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM Envelope sender username looks random 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (btcdrak[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1YqQ9l-0002EY-I3 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 18:04:22 -0000 --20cf307c9fb065d512051581bdc6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: > > And I'll ask again. Do you have a *specific, credible alternative*? > Because so far I'm not seeing one. > I think you are rubbing against your own presupposition that people must find and alternative right now. Quite a lot here do not believe there is any urgency, nor that there is an immanent problem that has to be solved before the sky falls in. --20cf307c9fb065d512051581bdc6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= hu, May 7, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote= :
And I'll ask again. Do you have a specific, credible alternative? Because so far I'm not seeing one.

=
I think you are rubbing against your own presupposition that peo= ple must find and alternative right now. Quite a lot here do not believe th= ere is any urgency, nor that there is an immanent problem that has to be so= lved before the sky falls in.
--20cf307c9fb065d512051581bdc6--