Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6cXN-0004fz-U7 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:31:41 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z6cXM-0007tP-VF for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:31:41 +0000 Received: by wicnd19 with SMTP id nd19so52743333wic.1 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 03:31:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=midwRyqRBi37Qg1NsWO2pgtvpo+noEq+a2dMiT46y1g=; b=lVJw/b7DFWKw+pEDlwmNa5NYIbnART9rCd4I9f31jRUCcHd6KEf4LOn6OmPskZHD27 GBWWJJp9fjkldN3WL48zqD+07QCxX25ppiBHkyL5oTIJpWwn/1tMt6rdXOPiC7+A0UQc 8ue4b91PC7xDWJvI/CykQfznSP01ZiiEXLME4/cy4qVPJLQdQh9CPjy1vCExeidtj9ug JLh+dDwrwyo0I81p1fAjSpTCrphiW9XPQh902vFPy0aszR20ACa+wTJMPfm8H74Dynzf KItWW4/RUtfoZV4oo+uwVBn22bCH05JdM2f7A+WOe25v8S95cCAvSafGUtI0gFZCVNAo E8AA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmk/DHo/it0zh+J7kP092R7dEh5SQmWwdJDKt/CQqN66yCfNNAs+OU9MxVLdOKLbcrL2LrH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.92.40 with SMTP id cj8mr21653316wib.92.1434882694909; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 03:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.139.235 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 03:31:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 12:31:34 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: Tier Nolan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.2 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1Z6cXM-0007tP-VF Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Motivation and deployment of consensus rules changes ([soft/hard]forks) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:31:42 -0000 On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Tier Nolan wrote: > The off by 1 bug could be fixed by a soft fork. Since the point is to show > how a non-controversial hard fork works, it doesn't matter much. You mean the timewarp fix can be coded as a softfork instead of a hardfork? How so? If that's the case, do you have a better candidate?