Return-Path: <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FAE8D15
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri,  8 Jan 2016 15:50:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com (mail-lf0-f47.google.com
	[209.85.215.47])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8BAF171
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri,  8 Jan 2016 15:50:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f47.google.com with SMTP id i124so9837333lfe.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 08 Jan 2016 07:50:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; bh=Bw+SG0464yPX2odGKHtUXJVsQ63tQOdaDSXIxw2ETbs=;
	b=QS1XFLVa+n1HpPkADkDNfzVygINdKLFkS/lxTPTTUZDm/20aS7p1CM/UHbIQUr7Onn
	pvpLKpy7H87ykIeg8orRXXjW/xlC+oqGRbLp6kiBphw4mmDq+9rwCg/5u+rps1ImxIyq
	4EuCrfK/ony0NPNdlvtPlnA/I1u9X5nimWRxGxNUpx0jT2XQKkSndx/tc9fD1BdVr7hd
	i26UR0PdhNJAZ2YCYWYcTCFrZRjcAk8l3NAJiNL1gVXWA1QgMsNPi1GAxKsJEty/wrJJ
	p7gYvx561GdRivDAoMkefdVjRqPhY818vLMcw25wWJCSbAfOsCFIwPtE4OYIuk41ayL0
	JG/Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.134.130 with SMTP id i124mr30699574lfd.63.1452268206121; 
	Fri, 08 Jan 2016 07:50:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.25.78 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:50:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T3MfndREm9icE-TUF58zsRZ5YsBMvUAMy4E-MmYWxWV=A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T3aTme2EQATamGGzeqNqJkUcPGa=0LVidJSRYNznM-myQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBhH0MODjjp8Avx+Fy_UGqzMjUq_jn3vT3oH=u3711tsSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<8760z4rbng.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<C4B5B9F1-9C53-45BC-9B30-F572C78096E3@mattcorallo.com>
	<8737u8qnye.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CABsx9T1gmz=sr_sEEuy8BQU6SXdmi58O30rzRWNW=0Ej98fi4A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160108153329.GA15731@sapphire.erisian.com.au>
	<CABsx9T3MfndREm9icE-TUF58zsRZ5YsBMvUAMy4E-MmYWxWV=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:50:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CABsx9T0WRXz54LZnyU7Fr=_ZgwF5armj0Z8uwYcFy2x+BWooxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fb2e88b71cf0528d48ae4
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:40:26 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Time to worry about 80-bit collision attacks or
	not?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:50:08 -0000

--001a113fb2e88b71cf0528d48ae4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

And to fend off the messag that I bet somebody is composing right now:

Yes, I know about a "security first" mindset.  But as I said earlier in the
thread, there is a tradeoff here between crypto strength and code
complexity, and "the strength of the crypto is all that matters" is NOT
security first.

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

--001a113fb2e88b71cf0528d48ae4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">And to fend off the messag that I bet somebody is composin=
g right now:<div><br></div><div>Yes, I know about a &quot;security first&qu=
ot; mindset.=C2=A0 But as I said earlier in the thread, there is a tradeoff=
 here between crypto strength and code complexity, and &quot;the strength o=
f the crypto is all that matters&quot; is NOT security first.</div><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><br></div>-- <br><div class=
=3D"gmail_signature">--<br>Gavin Andresen<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_sign=
ature"><br></div>
</div></div>

--001a113fb2e88b71cf0528d48ae4--