Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RK3yb-0002uA-7T for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:09:13 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.175; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com; helo=mail-gx0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.161.175]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1RK3ya-0007Hx-C6 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:09:13 +0000 Received: by ggnj1 with SMTP id j1so5256196ggn.34 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 01:09:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.2.164 with SMTP id 4mr1303879obv.49.1319875746833; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 01:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.55.227 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 01:09:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201110281956.04246.luke@dashjr.org> References: <201110281956.04246.luke@dashjr.org> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:09:06 +0200 Message-ID: From: John Smith To: Luke-Jr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044519e109a3d604b06b8597 X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (witchspace81[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com) 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1RK3ya-0007Hx-C6 Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.5 release updated X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:09:13 -0000 --f46d044519e109a3d604b06b8597 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Better would be a GUI=0/1 option to the bitcoin-qt.pro until a nicer > (ideally > automake/autoconf) system is implemented... > Are you sure you want to require qmake for the daemon build? I agree having a unified build system would be nice, but qmake doesn't add anything for non-qt software. Better to stick with a makefile. If the goal is 'making it easier for the user' maybe it'd be best to make a bash script that wraps both, that builds the daemon if possible, and the UI if possible, and converts command line flags. JS --f46d044519e109a3d604b06b8597 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Better would be = a GUI=3D0/1 option to the bitcoin-qt.pro until a nicer (ideally
automake/autoconf) system is implemented...

Are yo= u sure you want to require qmake for the daemon build?

I agree havin= g a unified build system would be nice, but qmake doesn't add anything = for non-qt software. Better to stick with a makefile.

If the goal is 'making it easier for the user' maybe it'd b= e best to make a bash script that wraps both, that builds the daemon if pos= sible, and the UI if possible, and converts command line flags.

JS
--f46d044519e109a3d604b06b8597--