Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QXfnP-0005Kc-U1 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:37:39 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1QXfnL-0005D7-1c for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:37:39 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:222:4dff:fe50:4c49]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 239D1560542; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:37:26 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:37:07 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106171637.09478.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1QXfnL-0005D7-1c Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Roadmap for autotools / Qt gui merge X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:37:40 -0000 On Friday, June 17, 2011 12:27:22 PM Gavin Andresen wrote: > I'm in favor of dropping the wxWidgets GUI and replacing it with a Qt > GUI. I think supporting more than one GUI for the reference client is > a bad idea. > > Qt is LGPL, so license for that is not an issue. > John, you willing to release your code under the bitcoin MIT license? > > Everybody else: anybody object to replacing "the devil we know" > (wxWidgets) with Qt? So long as we can get a solid name for it. Obviously I can't continue to call it wxBitcoin if it's strictly Qt...