Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WOIfC-0006D6-GU for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 03:20:02 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.169; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f169.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WOIfB-00051M-Nr for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 03:20:02 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f169.google.com with SMTP id h18so411440igc.0 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:19:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.114.82 with SMTP id f18mr42553icq.56.1394767196381; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.27.34 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:19:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 04:19:56 +0100 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: Jack Scott Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f6dce48ebdb04f4888b78 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WOIfB-00051M-Nr Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Physical key / edge detection software and PIN to generate private key X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 03:20:02 -0000 --20cf303f6dce48ebdb04f4888b78 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Jack Scott wrote: > A method is proposed to generate a Bitcoin private key by using a physical > key in conjunction with image recognition software and a PIN. Use edge > detection software applied to incoming video feed to convert the shape of a > physical key into an equation that describes the key. The hash of the > key's equation plus a user generated five digit pin can then be used to > create a Bitcoin private key. > Some practical nits: - Physical keys are vulnerable to photography-based reproduction attacks. That gets even worse if you use them to identify to a digital system as you can leave out the tiresome manual reproduction step. - The output from computer vision algorithms is notoriously noisy. If you use that as input for hashing a private key, it may become hard/impossible to reproduce (also, physical objects may deform over time). Wladimir --20cf303f6dce48ebdb04f4888b78 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On F= ri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Jack Scott <jack.scott.public@gmail= .com> wrote:
A method is proposed t= o generate a Bitcoin private key by using a physical key in conjunction wit= h image recognition software and a PIN. =C2=A0Use edge detection software a= pplied to incoming video feed to convert the shape of a physical key into a= n equation that describes the key. =C2=A0The hash of the key's equation= plus a user generated five digit pin can then be used to create a Bitcoin = private key.

Some practical nits:

<= /div>
- Physical keys are vulnerable to photography-based reproduction = attacks. That gets even worse if you use them to identify to a digital syst= em as you can leave out the tiresome manual reproduction step.

- The output from computer vision algorithms is notorio= usly noisy. If you use that as input for hashing a private key, it may beco= me hard/impossible to reproduce (also, physical objects may deform over tim= e).

Wladimir

--20cf303f6dce48ebdb04f4888b78--