Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.217.177 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.217.177; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-lb0-f177.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPWm=eV9YP3wAbCFt1JcSqJ6Jc3kY_546MVk3cHT+X8seC8vRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBgPG+2AMbEHSRQNFn6FikbRzxkWduj5MSZLz-O6Wh940w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALf2ePwc=es-aDSeJO2DZwu9kyHwq9dcp5TrMAhN-dvYwNjy-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<52FBD948.906@monetize.io> <201402122252.31060.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAPWm=eV9YP3wAbCFt1JcSqJ6Jc3kY_546MVk3cHT+X8seC8vRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:47:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSwjGohhiXuwhG3bJ5mLxSS8Dx0Hytmg7PhhRzwnw7FNQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Alex Morcos <morcos@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] [BIP proposal] Dealing with
	malleability
Precedence: list

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alex Morcos <morcos@gmail.com> wrote:
> I apologize if this has been discussed many times before.

It has been, but there are probably many people like you who have not
bothered researching who may also be curious.

> As a long term solution to malleable transactions, wouldn't it be possibl=
e
> to modify the signatures to be of the entire transaction.  Why do you hav=
e
> to zero out the inputs?  I can see that this would be a hard fork, and ma=
ybe
> it would be somewhat tricky to extract signatures first (since you can si=
gn
> everything except the signatures), but it would seem to me that this is a=
n
> important enough change to consider making.

Because doing so would be both unnecessary and ineffective.

Unnecessary because we can very likely eliminate malleability without
changing what is signed. It will take time, but we have been
incrementally moving towards that, e.g. v0.8 made many kinds of
non-canonical encoding non-standard.

Ineffective=E2=80=94 at least as you describe it=E2=80=94 because the signa=
tures
_themselves_ are malleable.