Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F174CC002D for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 19:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D998C60D6E for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 19:58:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2eS_Vt5dUNiV for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 19:58:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F4A860D57 for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 19:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id l19so10452137ljb.7 for ; Fri, 06 May 2022 12:58:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8iWQl3IpfM57m6r8n1nouRi5I0ktXCj3YA2gKsw0DQ8=; b=pLdfOs5pwa6irRpqZ2zeEizQvclmgOcqi9RPo+6HRdhnx4DV7RkxcxK/yHuv7irpFh byzXtOvDARGNN83+nj0MShUpxIWLcdzPFCdxEjxZsgqs20AY+HV/LDXumGOOMlHSBcPq PWkEDHmyaniTnomVxn7BwcOP/wr83/ucpROSAVpXLkBwTmArNOmKlfz9XV47hc/kvTQd EgYxry27PnEbZjlzIxNYYZgBElHpQqn19Jx50+95LJ8s4WqMcrgHAsnQ5g+mRnbWTUlw sodi7V78+C3pgXFSpog78aJqwkOK8b1QQbm0lkQEVnzTg6XcwpH9rV27IV96k7D1WZBw QvrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=8iWQl3IpfM57m6r8n1nouRi5I0ktXCj3YA2gKsw0DQ8=; b=1fOOdZhEhd3oxM1TlqlpCXuhjtk65XTQHImD9nPSQZJqBf5JzCmlrxH/jrXU3Ihl1s KUFdHoAUj9bUPtCyTTh6o7gUx44m4s2YH6eHAGvkdE0JZH8qjlQ0CE+4CkMoaOhjYgrE RkjtqeDNjIsEeHJZqR128zbARo89wJnpP2RhyQ8mHbXTBavEErPIXLAqHNp8fAvk7RAS LX7izK9j2S5TKaeK34o+uPhZ7l4l9zvV7IVz5tGOF1OcHAdqj6x5DYslspL5LCyaovIc 5XMlTBGCgtvktJrYkgIsfN580gP/9WiAPcum1/XmVH2b4Yg70Fgu+5xhOOwR6ZFGllHn Y2Zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Wp0am4gwjQfREBKqPrqTiLKvuxlHIqR8lbSiFAwsPG9zqcri7 22ktyutcZwMDmJLF5qJ4w4DPQLKKRcfO/2ixG1TXZpU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3bl8bFYl5eOyAq3paHcRqNEDbMjbCurkvcj4Jb71qJ2Ki2XcYqlfkTuWesyvoc3u6JAhxF6ctyuWxeTUrorg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:626:b0:24f:195a:3590 with SMTP id k38-20020a05651c062600b0024f195a3590mr2907271lje.390.1651867135906; Fri, 06 May 2022 12:58:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: John Tromp Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 21:58:44 +0200 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 May 2022 20:07:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] What to do when contentious soft fork activations are attempted X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 19:58:59 -0000 On Fri, 6 May 2022 7:17PM Jorge Tim?n wrote > But let's not personally attack andreas for his opinions. > The only reason you don't like bip8 is because you're ignorant about it and > you haven't reviewed it enough. Can you see the irony in equating "clueless about BIP119" with a personal attack and then calling Jeremy ignorant about BIP8? -John