Return-Path: <bitcoin@upalc.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0768186
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:44:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com
	[209.85.223.179])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B30263
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:44:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iodt126 with SMTP id t126so145352432iod.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=ovdp8ZeGdKkk1qP8x0VEWBt+KWYm3FGca5nZl8olUDY=;
	b=GfULw72PuhV/MqsXjXbRaLZ1CXN1AdONNA+ralnlppkCGlWrgQIR7ZbFlu2c4AGEjd
	RIgWuBn5Py2rdxH2jEPl9Y7pWjHffazD6IP8kYYnKSFTKbDBPJdp3ZtZBcj/cOWDnie8
	yVkLZsxcBetuYlIvHBtIp3sC4tZjjEHAtBlj64s8PJOIXbQ+xRQuLfKUB89vJ9Ce/snm
	L8fHWvldOWYrB0XEMmWfaDW9sFiDUzA1eIk8/ubp/iK0vCcBOOtGLqqknrHucRgG2yd5
	4PDzJ9uMwBbf0J/5xTmK2QXZNa+hlnovgZfFA3yHhRwbQJh+PrYfJMQNHXo3Iu/WnZuD
	Z9hQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwElO2VTazaiiHdDBbigqY5Wg7xh7Rh94uGQt/AzxJMyjgKYMRGwQCv7EKaJjsOkQ9zhjW
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.46.86 with SMTP id i83mr427689ioo.121.1439804694797;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.18.155 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [115.187.53.58]
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:14:54 +0530
Message-ID: <CAED3CWjfWAC-6=5P8OWx-1eP6Dq52K=c1L5B7h6fjGb71e-STw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Upal Chakraborty <bitcoin@upalc.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137949e612dbb051d7ea764
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:44:56 -0000

--001a1137949e612dbb051d7ea764
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I have tried to solve the maximum block size debate, depending on the
previous block size calculation.

Requesting for comment - http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php

--001a1137949e612dbb051d7ea764
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px">I have tried =
to solve the maximum block size debate, depending on the previous block siz=
e calculation.</span><br style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style=
=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349=
px">Requesting for comment -=C2=A0</span><a href=3D"http://upalc.com/maxblo=
cksize.php" target=3D"_blank" style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px">http:/=
/upalc.com/maxblocksize.php</a><br></div>

--001a1137949e612dbb051d7ea764--