Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8204958 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Fri, 5 May 2017 13:01:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3735E141 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Fri, 5 May 2017 13:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k91so7474122ioi.1 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Fri, 05 May 2017 06:01:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6iXFxD+ibSh2q3LZ7JyIZI4R4+TpA9aeeEiekIoznXA=; b=QX6ONYWiTzkG+Ongj18UxTuuh1K3IA5hyHTKhOZFvyy1k9F1UT9m7Uyg48biWBRt7p /VUKPmQJlBMXwPOxY+x5I7D4XUKoDWP4e57UNML9foOCRn2qpMXzTgN3MhsAZL252Osf iRZDAgS34eflHzU5X6m0K0f0q3bV7d/mPkOQIXxZHuglB3eFCTwa+jR8lCoh/QbftPjW QNs1pRYvDVm4f0/VmlDHBGm0dDjOMr9hcbEWhGMLsEjJqd8aRwAHpMcTd8CZ1lcFesLk P27PlvCShOjIwGGvpfrVzLbvc6wQEwoDKVkw6Ak97F1TpLuHLWmYUWe/iXJe/tYFDeF6 PsyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6iXFxD+ibSh2q3LZ7JyIZI4R4+TpA9aeeEiekIoznXA=; b=HFG3NWmNVUvR2ggFt8EOHa5kJhh357sC9RWPrUzg8eoEbmvoJWqv7UiAmZM7HxXKAT 5p/mpgdti2fBpro/8Yt3dnl6GAm1nUxYCkkvKpTjheisUHu5M/T6f+7rEJDvEp9F0AKe ul7twbKEzriH4F8TeB6yV5k88hz58miw6PkNw88vA2K/vh7VeCJNhzP24Y869M1S/I4T BKceOtmoZWWzca8zb2u1q9986sZoqG4KzXzAPRlmTST8OwxVfoNDjoOEpMWULFeuGJn7 drUz1VddqeYa1Ch1DPs7rvno94gXgxO/h3ciKTi7rFfJhQ2MNqqPQP/l6NzXDWQ1wkJg WGkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7Gqkb3JT6Ul1X+RdamD/QDxVMtef8xacDCpEKcfcS45bv7pDYc xGuMcal3JG5QS+7iDMYQ2f26++LHMw== X-Received: by 10.157.60.41 with SMTP id q38mr16961296otc.47.1493989301445; Fri, 05 May 2017 06:01:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.47.205 with HTTP; Fri, 5 May 2017 06:01:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1493983489.1448140.966773912.17FBAAC0@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1493983489.1448140.966773912.17FBAAC0@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 08:01:40 -0500 Message-ID: <CABaSBawLB+igz0Za18Risp1nhhG5s07Bv0jwKzqpXR=iq2kPiw@mail.gmail.com> To: Tomas <tomas@tomasvdw.nl>, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c01a7c9c6db6054ec67dc8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Non-confirming block signalling X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 13:01:43 -0000 --001a11c01a7c9c6db6054ec67dc8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Tomas via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I propose a method to mark blocks to indicate that they were generated > without verifying the previous block. This can be done by using a bit of > the version field. > see also: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011853.html - Bryan http://heybryan.org/ 1 512 203 0507 --001a11c01a7c9c6db6054ec67dc8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On F= ri, May 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Tomas via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a = href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bit= coin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote cla= ss=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid = rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div id=3D"gmail-:1msd" class=3D"gmail-a= 3s gmail-aXjCH gmail-m15bd8b2ee53f1a24">I propose a method to mark blocks t= o indicate that they were generated<br> without verifying the previous block. This can be done by using a bit of<br= > the version field.<br></div></blockquote></div><br>see also:</div><div clas= s=3D"gmail_extra"><a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bi= tcoin-dev/2015-December/011853.html">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipe= rmail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011853.html</a><br><div><br></div><div clas= s=3D"gmail_signature">- Bryan<br><a href=3D"http://heybryan.org/" target=3D= "_blank">http://heybryan.org/</a><br>1 512 203 0507</div> </div></div> --001a11c01a7c9c6db6054ec67dc8--