Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8204958 for ; Fri, 5 May 2017 13:01:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3735E141 for ; Fri, 5 May 2017 13:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k91so7474122ioi.1 for ; Fri, 05 May 2017 06:01:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6iXFxD+ibSh2q3LZ7JyIZI4R4+TpA9aeeEiekIoznXA=; b=QX6ONYWiTzkG+Ongj18UxTuuh1K3IA5hyHTKhOZFvyy1k9F1UT9m7Uyg48biWBRt7p /VUKPmQJlBMXwPOxY+x5I7D4XUKoDWP4e57UNML9foOCRn2qpMXzTgN3MhsAZL252Osf iRZDAgS34eflHzU5X6m0K0f0q3bV7d/mPkOQIXxZHuglB3eFCTwa+jR8lCoh/QbftPjW QNs1pRYvDVm4f0/VmlDHBGm0dDjOMr9hcbEWhGMLsEjJqd8aRwAHpMcTd8CZ1lcFesLk P27PlvCShOjIwGGvpfrVzLbvc6wQEwoDKVkw6Ak97F1TpLuHLWmYUWe/iXJe/tYFDeF6 PsyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6iXFxD+ibSh2q3LZ7JyIZI4R4+TpA9aeeEiekIoznXA=; b=HFG3NWmNVUvR2ggFt8EOHa5kJhh357sC9RWPrUzg8eoEbmvoJWqv7UiAmZM7HxXKAT 5p/mpgdti2fBpro/8Yt3dnl6GAm1nUxYCkkvKpTjheisUHu5M/T6f+7rEJDvEp9F0AKe ul7twbKEzriH4F8TeB6yV5k88hz58miw6PkNw88vA2K/vh7VeCJNhzP24Y869M1S/I4T BKceOtmoZWWzca8zb2u1q9986sZoqG4KzXzAPRlmTST8OwxVfoNDjoOEpMWULFeuGJn7 drUz1VddqeYa1Ch1DPs7rvno94gXgxO/h3ciKTi7rFfJhQ2MNqqPQP/l6NzXDWQ1wkJg WGkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7Gqkb3JT6Ul1X+RdamD/QDxVMtef8xacDCpEKcfcS45bv7pDYc xGuMcal3JG5QS+7iDMYQ2f26++LHMw== X-Received: by 10.157.60.41 with SMTP id q38mr16961296otc.47.1493989301445; Fri, 05 May 2017 06:01:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.47.205 with HTTP; Fri, 5 May 2017 06:01:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1493983489.1448140.966773912.17FBAAC0@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1493983489.1448140.966773912.17FBAAC0@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Bryan Bishop Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 08:01:40 -0500 Message-ID: To: Tomas , Bryan Bishop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c01a7c9c6db6054ec67dc8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Non-confirming block signalling X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 13:01:43 -0000 --001a11c01a7c9c6db6054ec67dc8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Tomas via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I propose a method to mark blocks to indicate that they were generated > without verifying the previous block. This can be done by using a bit of > the version field. > see also: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011853.html - Bryan http://heybryan.org/ 1 512 203 0507 --001a11c01a7c9c6db6054ec67dc8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On F= ri, May 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Tomas via bitcoin-dev <bit= coin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
I propose a method to mark blocks t= o indicate that they were generated
without verifying the previous block. This can be done by using a bit of the version field.

see also:
--001a11c01a7c9c6db6054ec67dc8--