Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SXblT-0003RS-14 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 24 May 2012 17:23:55 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1SXblP-0007sb-6n for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 24 May 2012 17:23:54 +0000 Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5so29266lbo.34 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 10:23:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=TUvwcacwD6Cj0pbnJpaLqdhJb/RyzEAzPoUxehlI5l4=; b=fcrZYtUMH2GXchdLii4nQ1wzpE0+0RxwklhTQyNt8sc3DscBvnaigRw7Oi4UcCwp/Z XHpQR7UW36ESmKQ3vch6RN1u8V1wVZPAU32cKSQ1Z8eyPHg0aA5RfYUPHFiW1jYxud2F ZgJFei3AFgy5ByMzue4Xh/92G1x0HvXuJcmP49NgeKXvY/WWSmqnmBQRmdPjlMQdsuJp 5xQZeDyjMYUfhhER7DuBoMr+DbpN9aWajApM/Ocw5OTft1QoBNoozU+vGihb1yEEUwsG 8vFTMycFlrNjaAHCANz7vO7zxtiiVLeB+r6T/T3oZWO1XBIGKrUUiAvwFCYRAWa+XCFq tKWQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.46.101 with SMTP id u5mr116847lbm.21.1337880224538; Thu, 24 May 2012 10:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.0.103 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 10:23:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [99.43.178.25] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:23:44 -0400 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Joel Joonatan Kaartinen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlamUHxXocKIMXOQuySxJas66p3rTsXEEuRQtDjajp9ieBTQ8Vk4xRh2Eqqo6uZeO9WmfPA X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1SXblP-0007sb-6n Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 17:23:55 -0000 On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Joel Joonatan Kaartinen wrote: > optimization that avoids rechecking transactions that have already been > verified as valid. Any transactions it doesn't have to verify are from the > pool, of course :) Work in this area is already progressing, though it is outside the scope of this proposal regarding lazy miners and empty blocks. -- Jeff Garzik exMULTI, Inc. jgarzik@exmulti.com