Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VYCcB-0003Eq-UP for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:21:35 +0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1VYCcA-0008LX-7s for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:21:35 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z5so528292lbh.21 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 03:21:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1lvJ1LtvtL5ubWGBmp7coEuO03zrQ01c6risxuTaMYU=; b=Jk9NiqGqQdNP2/m/+hhXnuZ46R4seqnQNRuTqbzNfV29Ek4gd111pOTTGH3bVZ49Zh Yq8u5OHgCaZtF8jpB88GM4j9vVPWUiveqPsVDVul2d3q+891Rpwh1sakXrl3D4DRS7Wo FpCSRfx0ygg8aCsGvMudEfs3GU0LU4OoQINLvP1BjsAmkZ1SbBi/roT97yI8Xoaspmcd ll5Xia3Lm/5/jwQkFKJ1PBVjChj/5IEeeCUHvsHBLOjKUkrlP1RQ/V8f7fvNHIL/NQi6 qDNlG/Qy8RnBn9hItv+bqohRQVkBFmwsRa6OQik65jBNNp20Avx8gIeqpEKRCwVrMziB ODxA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkw/7PkHdBnyzA4U1i18QWMkMARceebZLuo4AYBoeN1922+/6OXOlCy3+uIGfdENHKCIaAm MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.234.168 with SMTP id uf8mr846279lbc.35.1382350887378; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 03:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.40.15 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 03:21:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [85.59.136.164] In-Reply-To: <5D2C71C4-565F-4991-90E4-5782A9C83360@me.com> References: <38895569-E6E1-4576-9E36-B00B53F9D3CC@me.com> <201310192229.19932.luke@dashjr.org> <19909B49-0895-4130-99FB-9A116140CFE9@me.com> <20131019235746.GA29032@savin> <9EF588BB-14B5-495A-8253-82574DCB1A8A@me.com> <20131020224316.GA25280@savin> <20131021062555.GA10784@savin> <80401395-792A-4637-A75C-1D499C547F98@me.com> <20131021064320.GA17190@savin> <5264D1DB.5060107@250bpm.com> <5D2C71C4-565F-4991-90E4-5782A9C83360@me.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:21:27 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= To: Jean-Paul Kogelman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: me.com] X-Headers-End: 1VYCcA-0008LX-7s Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] A critique of bitcoin open source community X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:21:36 -0000 I think it's great to move BIPs to github. I also agree with the states -> directories mapping. Git manages moved files well. On 10/21/13, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote: > > On 2013-10-21, at 2:44 AM, Arto Bendiken wrote: > >> >> Indeed. The BIP analogs that immediately come to mind would be the >> enhancement proposal processes for Python, XMPP, and BitTorrent: > > Bitcoin's BIP process is directly based off of Python's PEP process. > > Quote from BIP 1, History: > > This document was derived heavily from Python's PEP-0001. In many places > text was simply copied and modified. > --=20 Jorge Tim=F3n http://freico.in/