References: <CAAS2fgQpMWYLoT_1Za5AxvgNaXvEuJOZ2BjE94o09=t+LyfM5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1324429140.3740.YahooMailNeo@web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<201112202007.49399.luke@dashjr.org>
Message-ID: <1324430050.21731.YahooMailNeo@web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:14:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <201112202007.49399.luke@dashjr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="344044665-1924334194-1324430050=:21731"
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP language on normative behavior
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>

--344044665-1924334194-1324430050=:21731
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

OK, give me a shout on IRC. It is a lot of work though, so be prepared. Bring bags of patience :)


________________________________
 From: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP language on normative behavior
 
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:59:00 PM Amir Taaki wrote:
> A few weeks back I was in discussion with the IANA on getting a bitcoin URI
> accepted in the standard. As a prerequisite I had to read 5 huge
> documents. I did not end up writing that RFC.

I also contacted the IANA about getting the bitcoin URI spec accepted on their 
index, however never heard back. If you want, please have whoever you 
discussed it with get in touch with me. Either way, please be sure whatever 
they index is compliant with the spec on the wiki as-is (especially not being 
BTC unit specific, as this is clearly non-scalable).

Luke
--344044665-1924334194-1324430050=:21731
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>OK, give me a shout on IRC. It is a lot of work though, so be prepared. Bring bags of patience :)<br></span></div><div><br></div>  <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> <hr size="1">  <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Luke-Jr &lt;luke@dashjr.org&gt;<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Amir Taaki &lt;zgenjix@yahoo.com&gt; <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:07 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP language on normative behavior<br> </font> <br>
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:59:00 PM Amir Taaki wrote:<br>&gt; A few weeks back I was in discussion with the IANA on getting a bitcoin URI<br>&gt; accepted in the standard. As a prerequisite I had to read 5 huge<br>&gt; documents. I did not end up writing that RFC.<br><br>I also contacted the IANA about getting the bitcoin URI spec accepted on their <br>index, however never heard back. If you want, please have whoever you <br>discussed it with get in touch with me. Either way, please be sure whatever <br>they index is compliant with the spec on the wiki as-is (especially not being <br>BTC unit specific, as this is clearly non-scalable).<br><br>Luke<br><br><br> </div> </div>  </div></body></html>
--344044665-1924334194-1324430050=:21731--