Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SuMEI-0000iI-49 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:27:42 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.175; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-we0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1SuMEC-0001MN-Mr for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:27:42 +0000 Received: by weyr6 with SMTP id r6so1316176wey.34 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 04:27:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.217.3.7 with SMTP id q7mr9951421wes.47.1343302050635; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 04:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.19.13 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 04:27:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:27:30 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ctKmuTsYUmnYNq0ScQ5wOqLfZQY Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Jeff Garzik Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1SuMEC-0001MN-Mr Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin script opcode counts X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:27:42 -0000 > OP_CODESEPARATOR 14 > OP_DEPTH 182 I'm interested to see what scripts were using OP_DEPTH and OP_CODESEPARATOR, as the latter appears to be useless to my eyes. Could you give some tx ids which use unusual opcodes?