Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1TuopK-0002Bm-Gb for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:32:06 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.172; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f172.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1TuopJ-0003B5-VW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:32:06 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id o1so1503693wic.5 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:31:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.78.162 with SMTP id c2mr136273634wjx.46.1358188319876; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:31:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.176.164 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:31:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpdV5SNDBU=y07qPcvPksWOQ35uHpsSopAVRQX-xU=o6-Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130114104447.GA15854@savin> <CA+8xBpdV5SNDBU=y07qPcvPksWOQ35uHpsSopAVRQX-xU=o6-Q@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:31:59 -0500 Message-ID: <CABsx9T3FpVq-m8P=ZbFmsJMni-4g0y4+hQ+hqy2gUKi84jw9DQ@mail.gmail.com> From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1TuopJ-0003B5-VW Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: make the private key for testnet genesis block public X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:32:06 -0000 The testnet3 genesis block is identical to the main network genesis block, except it has a different timestamp and nonce. So its coinbase pays to the same public key as the main network. I don't have that private key. Good idea for testnet4, whenever that happens, though. -- -- Gavin Andresen