Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A38F9884 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 13:23:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com (mail-qk0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B8B156 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 13:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t7so984337qkh.2 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:23:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6xEGvZB/rDC895H40VpRfjvTzlOAiqqvG6YUyilUQkA=; b=L8egjBvRiAHCYG38zRG91H6NmtyZ3fL9Sib7u6LfZobGw0acmc4QSrC2h6rsV1FtX4 JxJFuuGLzq08C6Oyq9NTO1kq22i3iJKmta7ok5pW21m6pxsQM8xbjdIWhv7NYpg+orjZ IMam8KlOM4pwU/E13W2tt/yp8ZfdB5YCzR6fQleTOty3sZ3EetUceDinOD8+HwrQvJq1 cdtn0t8OtOktNPsqDOqAMuTrjBcf2owuirz7rNI333H41E+vy70Va23kF4SR+bES+D4f b/E9SnRnhXlAgy8gm16x7/lRJ7egHIsdaQQsHPW4WmLwmrqrrhxP98/7O6uZ73goxfey i+Ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6xEGvZB/rDC895H40VpRfjvTzlOAiqqvG6YUyilUQkA=; b=kU+OCuCtCIh3NKISJ024wmAdJCm6GcC0R6A5eRJzXLbE6HcsSCvcZPuGkyCWhwhqHd 8asuTkNX6WYy89H3volKDyFzj4Y8+yaLq3m9TbRGcPIOudQUSVXPH1xCQOccI1EpmAzk a+Xg6CQg4QdNmgvP0kz+ZQfgzApQ3e5Z65axBcJfkYu9leR9w8dNsTEtB6GNQsYNoNUI E1ehKHQXW5N5pMiK/vwKUfsQk3kzZbg1/RmL56rQEBdK6KmCTRpof/3giuPwTWOve5sX vwe++JyRhpVtrT37rHIu24J4j8Z6a1bOPb0+wE35EiEFGzmLQxoUt3pepFLmzwZ5+55T nOww== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPeqDnWFfiB40rVnFYQ+0LbZQb/Rko7fDDCgL06VRaJjkW+H5StUf1yo/ywiJObdw== X-Received: by 10.55.166.81 with SMTP id p78mr9508756qke.18.1473513812507; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:23:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([129.2.206.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o43sm4995905qtc.7.2016.09.10.06.23.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:23:32 -0700 (PDT) To: Johnson Lau , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion References: <15713790962.be73b87e4580.3663496705131622210@xbt.hk> From: Andrew C Message-ID: Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:23:44 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <15713790962.be73b87e4580.3663496705131622210@xbt.hk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Completing the retirement of the alert system X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 13:23:33 -0000 On 9/10/2016 5:41 AM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote: > 3. After a few months or so, publish the private key. Why wait a few months? Why not just publish the key a few days after the final alert?