Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2BAC0011 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBD681D9F for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.035 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=willtech.com.au Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NE7jhsmwnrKr for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from burlywood.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (burlywood.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.26]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6F2381445 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: hostpapa|x-authuser|damian@willtech.com.au Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998234C11CD; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s110.servername.online (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: hostpapa) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 21F7A4C10D0; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:41 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1645670081; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dInfVSCVjxcIM04y2AxnF3ENU3DMyd+0HsepBrsJ6e5DhA40XW9lV/+9IWpOpJbGaVmGTl ttFKfPN47WfVRUdBXiYlFkqY5XKvHxf9FHuczxqUau+LaYOjy+Jqa/GCAXmDhJTiLqrRUk 34VnneMJX5iIi5vMl0nngCdvSDbnuf8R5pcFWaKmDjltNVxZeGnCYoMyR1ehzdGFcoDvVA dl1Et0IEYZ+3sfzNo8ULBBaMOikNtYCIzGmwYctvZSREFsCs2LSDA+XDNiGb/xvB8LyqEA fPBGsRPQQBHplQ7bIL3FtqcvuZ4SO5uHsZiLQ510vaylTjfjN3KYGrP/3JK/+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1645670081; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=6cstRCvSiDiraynu0RxPeMFqPFk7LolZ+XVAd/bzI50=; b=11y3XaUEfSVURam6ovcA+NuU9aTXp9RLTRCXE3Ht3PpQc1XZpBRLTQ9Q1fBMPsg4diKhw3 O4a58Bx9gp3EiQ2J1IhUfhtgOASZx9keBBKfk2utwLpQuNdyW8LnJQgfnAqylTU7GK77Za MGKkhTyUTFYfTjZlqDV+jK9Ma/vIuajdXuSdDBao8Sp6u60M04FB/zlakDWGbKpBCF8Tlo 3t34SNXLXO3e81kbiuqjwmtj2ps9wKYfxeNnxy7tavBqYI2DEo2/nZP8PtAPktNdysqLM8 5CW/IxP/+lCaPaFPXQvH3Su8I8ZvKL41zALTcwpGMfsgPg7orbM4kVVpTqRgdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-78dc4959d8-q9pdd; auth=pass smtp.auth=hostpapa smtp.mailfrom=damian@willtech.com.au X-Sender-Id: hostpapa|x-authuser|damian@willtech.com.au Received: from s110.servername.online (s110.servername.online [204.44.192.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.107.255.153 (trex/6.5.3); Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:41 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Junk X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostpapa|x-authuser|damian@willtech.com.au X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostpapa X-Harmony-Obese: 152d14310ca356a3_1645670081466_574193773 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1645670081466:2648861231 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1645670081466 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=willtech.com.au; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:MIME-Version:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6cstRCvSiDiraynu0RxPeMFqPFk7LolZ+XVAd/bzI50=; b=Oq29gPwR9jWBAFUD7w8rJ2898Z LA9WIPoQUHlxItzRLz9pcW8psAVvEn+QdOy5DWeJJ+PCi5cQtJBexdeg5QHgDjihHG5TjuDhEvwS9 1YP2pPEr8+Sb+cfXKRFQmAEjbu82N1fuhdvKdmI+lEpydgoEGXmZCriG5IpaERy4bDXZOKvjDsQ/F 66Glc2Bm12zurLk+5stdhFxAE5m9AIqN3LYKL/Yis7byfq+OiIUQ4zKIN6Ar27c89EJmeimYNPM4H 5og2LLuxsZ1JO2//fo9ZrKwDCxTlV7J1vbDH7NBjKiUYJ5z38XuydQgRCJm5Z2+5MBR6BlN93xUVz lObL/EiA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52410 helo=s110.servername.online) by s110.servername.online with esmtpa (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nN3xo-009rlM-HS; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:34:40 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 13:34:39 +1100 From: damian@willtech.com.au To: Casey Rodarmor In-Reply-To: References: <0642a5e59464779569f9d0aab452ee27@willtech.com.au> <96471a093e3c3d9862c3d47ebe731df6@willtech.com.au> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.12 Message-ID: X-Sender: damian@willtech.com.au Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AuthUser: damian@willtech.com.au X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 08:15:13 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Draft-BIP: Ordinal Numbers X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:45 -0000 Not all people who have been stolen from believe that they have lost the right and title to what has been stolen and in many cases they have not. I do not excuse Bitcoin that it is impossible to have any individual Bitcoin identified but also I do not care, if I receive Bitcoin honestly I do not care what their history was. What if they were taken from a brothel? It is not a matter for an ordinal to determine if a satoshi is fungible. It is truth in effect that each satoshi is newly created to the new UTXO and the old satoshi destroyed. -DA. On 2022-02-23 18:31, Casey Rodarmor wrote: >> ​The least reasonable thing I could expect is some claimed former >> holder of some ordianls turning up to challenge me that it was their >> stolen Bitcoin was some of what I received. > > I think it's unlikely that this would come to pass. A previous owner > of an ordinal wouldn't have any particular reason to expect that they > should own it after they transfer it. Similar to how noting a dollar > bill's serial number doesn't give you a claim to it after you spend > it. From the BIP: > >> ​Since any ordinal can be sent to any address at any time, >> ordinals that are transferred, even those with some public history, >> should be considered to be fungible with other satoshis with no such >> history. [1] > > > > Links: > ------ > [1] > https://github.com/casey/ord/blob/master/bip.mediawiki#backward-compatibility