Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mcaldwell@swipeclock.com>) id 1WbyLy-0003iC-CK
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 20 Apr 2014 20:28:42 +0000
Received-SPF: fail (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of swipeclock.com
	does not designate 74.201.97.201 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.201.97.201; envelope-from=mcaldwell@swipeclock.com;
	helo=mxout.myoutlookonline.com; 
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com ([74.201.97.201])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WbyLx-0002RL-L9
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 20 Apr 2014 20:28:42 +0000
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAF18C028D
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:28:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan
Received: from HUB022.mail.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C36DA8C026A
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:28:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from MAILR023.mail.lan ([10.110.18.122]) by HUB022.mail.lan
	([10.110.17.22]) with mapi; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:28:35 -0400
From: Mike Caldwell <mcaldwell@swipeclock.com>
To: Christophe Biocca <christophe.biocca@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:28:34 -0400
Thread-Topic: [Bitcoin-development] "bits": Unit of account
Thread-Index: Ac9c1xpkYsUihhhsTCC21TIySGvHFw==
Message-ID: <4098C706-D67F-474E-9C13-E4C8F56B41ED@swipeclock.com>
References: <CAJKMfeQO6pyi5b-83FyMSHcq0Sa1QkP+RouQVBdCYPtXXboY8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<53540715.7050803@xylon.de>
	<1C408C12-B39B-46E4-B997-153D566158B1@swipeclock.com>
	<5354154C.1080908@olivere.de>
	<CANOOu=9=TAnaCuyh_P2GqHaguyY39xjhj84HSA_x+6F4MOqM_A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANOOu=9=TAnaCuyh_P2GqHaguyY39xjhj84HSA_x+6F4MOqM_A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	4.0 SPF_CHECK_FAIL SPF reports sender host as NOT permitted to send
	mails from
	0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
X-Headers-End: 1WbyLx-0002RL-L9
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] "bits": Unit of account
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 20:28:42 -0000

By culturally neutral I mean we avoid deliberately invoking a cultural refe=
rence in the name.  For example "satoshi" would be a reference to Japanese =
culture just for being a common Japanese name regardless of who Satoshi tur=
ns out to be.=20

Mike

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 20, 2014, at 1:20 PM, "Christophe Biocca" <christophe.biocca@gmail=
.com> wrote:
>=20
> Culturally neutral? "bit" in French phonetically collides with slang
> for phallus ("bitte", with a silent "e"). Apparently it means "louse"
> in Turkish as well.
>=20
> Not that this really would be avoidable with any short word (all the
> short possible words are usually taken), but it's not neutral.
>=20
>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Oliver Egginger <bitcoin@olivere.de> wr=
ote:
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> just my two 'cents':
>>=20
>> Terms arises by itself. Just as most people speak of coins when they
>> mean bitcoins. I do not see that bitcoin is currently in common use
>> except for speculation. Therefore no term for smaller units has
>> established yet. No problem in my eyes. Time will tell.
>>=20
>> - oliver
>>=20
>>=20
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------
>> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
>> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and the=
ir
>> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
>> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and thei=
r
> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development