Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17A9D16C7 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 04:55:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA0A90 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 04:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.localnet (adsl-98-70-226-45.gnv.bellsouth.net [98.70.226.45]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 113F110801BF; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 04:54:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:151006:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::L0nfJSwNUuLaaAPO:eDp9 X-Hashcash: 1:25:151006:milly@bitcoins.info::fr7M=N=HdOH529tb:cwpws From: Luke Dashjr To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Milly Bitcoin Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 04:54:13 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.6-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) References: <8EF9A9A8-3EBE-4427-9745-1C494DF12E9A@gmx.com> <5613428F.4080504@bitcoins.info> In-Reply-To: <5613428F.4080504@bitcoins.info> X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201510060454.14127.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork technical debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 04:55:01 -0000 On Tuesday, October 06, 2015 3:39:59 AM Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev wrote: > In any case if I could get a list of "Core Developers" as referenced in > the copyright notice that would also be good since that is a legal notice. The copyright notice refers to the fact that each contributor owns copyright to his own contributions. There is no legal group that owns copyright to the entirety of the code. Luke