Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sg2aA-00083O-St for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:39:06 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.216.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.46; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-qa0-f46.google.com; Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Sg2aA-00053i-7w for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:39:06 +0000 Received: by qadb17 with SMTP id b17so452315qad.12 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:39:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.207.4 with SMTP id fw4mr19317173qab.82.1339889940711; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.144.205 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:39:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120616192651.GA13438@vps7135.xlshosting.net> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:39:00 -0400 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Gavin Andresen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1Sg2aA-00053i-7w Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] After compressed pubkeys: hybrid pubkeys X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:39:07 -0000 On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > RE: 0x06/0x07 'hybrid' public keys: > >> Any opinions? Forbidding it certainly makes alternative implementation >> slightly easier in the future, but I'm not sure the hassle of a network >> rule change is worth it. > > I say treat any transactions that use them as 'non-standard' -- don't > relay/mine them by default, but accept blocks that happen to contain > them. > > I agree that a rule change isn't worth it right now, but making them > non-standard now is easy and should make a rule change in the future > easier. ACK. Hopefully no one will mine these before we can merge denying them into another rule change. But if they do, oh well.