Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XwdfP-0007Qx-29 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:10:27 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of dashjr.org designates 85.234.147.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=85.234.147.28; envelope-from=luke@dashjr.org; helo=zinan.dashjr.org; Received: from 85-234-147-28.static.as29550.net ([85.234.147.28] helo=zinan.dashjr.org) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1XwdfN-0005X8-Mr for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:10:27 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB8E7108039B; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 21:10:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Luke Dashjr To: Jeffrey Paul Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 21:10:14 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.17.3-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201412041542.44207.luke@dashjr.org> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201412042110.16655.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1XwdfN-0005X8-Mr Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Serialised P2SH HD chains X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:10:27 -0000 On Thursday, December 04, 2014 8:02:17 PM Jeffrey Paul wrote: > What is the use case for something like this? It=E2=80=99s my impression= that a > single token that can be used to obtain many P2SH addresses paying to a > multisig script looks something like >=20 > bitcoin:?r=3Dhttps://payee.com/customer12345/recurring/paymentrequest/= new This requires the payee operate a server. My use case is for payment to=20 individuals, who may or may not have a computer powered at the time of the= =20 transactions being sent. Furthermore, the users I am targeting (miners, to = be=20 specific), wish to remain entirely anonymous, and not hold accounts of any= =20 sort. > The model that you describe where a payer can, without communication with > the payee, generate additional multisig p2sh addresses based on a set of > xpubs presumes that the payee would never want to e.g. cycle their own > keys or change their cooperating multisig participants=E2=80=99 keys. Is= this > wise? This depends on the framework. As of present day, miners are limited to onl= y=20 use a single address ever, and cannot change it even to avoid address reuse= =2E=20 One goal is to solve that, without breaking multisig. Luke