From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:02:11 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.6-gentoo; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <CANEZrP2hbBVGqytmXR1rAcVama4ONnR586Se-Ch=dsxOzy2O4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<201404231955.09287.luke@dashjr.org>
	<26C186B9-B60D-4092-BA78-7039B23B7AE1@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <26C186B9-B60D-4092-BA78-7039B23B7AE1@bitsofproof.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201404232002.12688.luke@dashjr.org>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure
Precedence: list

On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:01:16 PM Tamas Blummer wrote:
> On 23.04.2014, at 21:55, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> > Any wallet should import all the coins just fine, it just wouldn't *use*
> > any account other than 0. Remember addresses are used to receive
> > bitcoins; once the UTXOs are in the wallet, they are no longer
> > associated with the address or any other details of how they were
> > received.
> 
> This is a bit idealistic.
> The wallet has to know how it got the UTXO in order to be able to spend it.

No it doesn't... Just the assigned scriptPubKey and secret(s) required to 
satisfy it.