Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RsB84-000363-LA for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:40:00 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.130] helo=cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RsB7y-0006bY-O0 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:40:00 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: sipa@ulyssis.org X-Spam-Status: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-48.797, required 5, autolearn=disabled, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 0.00, FAKE_REPLY_C 0.00, FREEMAIL_FROM 0.00, KUL_SMTPS -50.00, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 1.20) X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: A87CB12802B.A7604 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87CB12802B for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:39:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.ulyssis.org (mail.ulyssis.student.kuleuven.be [193.190.253.235]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14C5F3862 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:39:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from wop.ulyssis.org (wop.intern.ulyssis.org [192.168.0.182]) by smtp.ulyssis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7803410052 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:41:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by wop.ulyssis.org (Postfix, from userid 615) id 8FF7F87C1AB; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:39:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:39:44 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Pieter Wuille To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20120131103943.GA31329@ulyssis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://sipa.ulyssis.org/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 0.0 FAKE_REPLY_C FAKE_REPLY_C 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1RsB7y-0006bY-O0 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 21 (modification BIP 20)] X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:40:00 -0000 On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:35:26AM +0100, Wladimir wrote: > I also wonder whether the "send to private address" should be part of this > BIP, or a future one. It is actually a "send of private key", not to. And I agree, it should be part of a separate BIP. -- Pieter