Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WTYgT-0000s7-Qk for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:27:05 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1WTYgS-00016w-DS for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:27:05 +0000 Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.2.2]); authenticated by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1WTYgL-0005Pn-Mt; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:26:57 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6E55C40D-D6B4-42D6-9654-13E85CC61413"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Tamas Blummer In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:26:57 +0100 Message-Id: References: <612FFAAD-14FF-4261-927D-BD2E0F287257@bitsofproof.com> <85A1792C-502E-4AC6-B8BC-A10C8FC1917F@bitsofproof.com> To: Mike Hearn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1396020424; c6902d7b; X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1WTYgS-00016w-DS Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 70 refund field X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:27:06 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_6E55C40D-D6B4-42D6-9654-13E85CC61413 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 28.03.2014, at 16:23, Mike Hearn wrote: > So I take it BOPShop won't be supporting BIP70 then? :( >=20 Supporting BIP70 by BitPay or BopShop is a cake since it does no more = then they did without it. I am not in opposition but see no reason to be enthusiastic about it. I = will once the spec goes further than what was possible before. --Apple-Mail=_6E55C40D-D6B4-42D6-9654-13E85CC61413 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTNZTBAAoJEPZykcUXcTkcfh0H/j4ydr8X93lZqnHf3KDfUP0V fs8ISyIG7Ms7lesJ5X5lKAtFMMeGKoE2fKjEJZIDfvGaW/EkprAZ+vBY7smDeu6x 9HdcSwBIQx/XxivnSbnviytvwfPrc20q3KjnaIUyhU3jMITn1KmOG/aQHvmulgE0 7sD5Lf+va1xmJeGfnhU5xFqltNciwtWDolPnLA4KksFTOzhnNFy5IsYsefspNYTt lgaEunZiXblMeN1eaPTpNcMqlWBPLS5ZaMzmZALXreQwAx/JA+nxc7kBA7XqszXl y5KLH6uMFCSu7fEnthcvbU3GEPqZt2drGMSEvALo1wIH0VfmbBuCB5i3hJggOCY= =SBGs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_6E55C40D-D6B4-42D6-9654-13E85CC61413--