Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UF9ap-0004XV-CW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:45:12 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.52; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f52.google.com; Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1UF9an-00016Q-8U for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:45:11 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fs12so4443728lab.11 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:45:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.42.37 with SMTP id k5mr5122238lbl.49.1363034702481; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.96.164 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:45:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1363030071-26731-1-git-send-email-runesvend@gmail.com> <201303111935.55767.luke@dashjr.org> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:45:02 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: =?UTF-8?Q?Rune_Kj=C3=A6r_Svendsen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1UF9an-00016Q-8U Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [PATCH] Change recommended fee to 0.001 BTC X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:45:12 -0000 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Rune Kj=C3=A6r Svendsen wrote: > The question is if we should define a new value, that we use solely to > display in this text, or if we should use MIN_TX_FEE or MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE = in > some way. What are the dev's thoughts? It should be a new value.