Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1WIHXg-0004tt-RQ
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:55:24 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.173; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f173.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WIHXf-0001ys-SX
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:55:24 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id wp18so2004478obc.4
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 04:55:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.165.72 with SMTP id yw8mr699951oeb.71.1393332918490; Tue,
	25 Feb 2014 04:55:18 -0800 (PST)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.71.231 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 04:55:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <f35865264f37315d580a30dc49789a5a.squirrel@fulvetta.riseup.net>
References: <20140225044116.GA28050@savin>
	<f35865264f37315d580a30dc49789a5a.squirrel@fulvetta.riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:25:18 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: vNNbO-F7kwJG5NDLLLtMoK0nqXE
Message-ID: <CANEZrP1wB9zpnD+DOnmCNycEGB+nZMt8gQrjpn5V92MMkausaA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Odinn Cyberguerrilla <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b41904ba91eab04f33a995e
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WIHXf-0001ys-SX
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fee drop
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:55:25 -0000

--047d7b41904ba91eab04f33a995e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Given that the fee drop puts fees in "real" (i.e. dollar) terms back to
where they were some months ago, it seems odd to claim this is creating
vulnerabilities that didn't exist in the previous version. The cost of an
attack would be the same as before.

--047d7b41904ba91eab04f33a995e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Given that the fee drop puts fees in &quot;real&quot; (i.e=
. dollar) terms back to where they were some months ago, it seems odd to cl=
aim this is creating vulnerabilities that didn&#39;t exist in the previous =
version. The cost of an attack would be the same as before.</div>

--047d7b41904ba91eab04f33a995e--