Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
	designates 62.13.149.75 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=62.13.149.75; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
	helo=outmail149075.authsmtp.net; 
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 10:41:22 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: joliver@airmail.cc
Message-ID: <20150222154122.GA14930@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <CALqxMTGBVdMX2RkuXNhkJ38XRM6DgAj+OmQTfHWuVF=emD-06Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150222123428.GA6570@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CALqxMTHuD1WuV_mVeSD-TaFszVms=hogUTL2bNc7YgNDyhVOoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150222143353.GA32621@savin.petertodd.org>
	<48c47e2a2c7916e7bf63f2219a9aeb72@airmail.cc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <48c47e2a2c7916e7bf63f2219a9aeb72@airmail.cc>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes
 double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Precedence: list


--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:18:05PM +0000, joliver@airmail.cc wrote:
> > Indeed, which is why I wrote some easy-to-use and highly effective=20
> > tools
> > to pull off double-spends and made sure to publicise them and their
> > effectiveness widely. They've had their desired effect and very few
> > people are relying on unconfirmed transactions anymore.
>=20
> You mean you wrote a bunch of FUD about zeroconf transactions while=20
> working for companies like Coinbase and GreenAddress that were trying to=
=20
> sell 100% centralized solutions? Lets just be clear on this.

You lot spend so much time trying to claim I'm working for people I'm
not that I have a bad feeling I'm going to end up having to explain what
an internet troll is to "friendly" Revenue Canada tax auditor...

> I and many other people tried your replace-by-fee tools and found out=20
> that they worked **maybe** 1-2% of the time. You claimed 95% success=20
> rates.

That tool was intentionally shipped with unclear instructions and nearly
all the double-spend strategies turned off by default; you can easily
increase that number with a little understanding.

> > As for the
> > remaining, next week alone I'll be volunteering one or two hours of my
> > consulting time to discuss solutions with a team doing person-to-person
> > trading for instance.
>=20
> A "team"
>=20
> You mean a **Company**? We don't need yet another 100% centralized=20
> LocalBitcoins snooping on our transactions.

"[Bitcoin-development] Eliminating double-spends with two-party
self-escrow for high value transactions",
Peter Todd, Apt 26th 2014,
http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg=
05166.html

(note that the above should be updated to use CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY)

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000017c2f346f81e93956c538531682f5af3a95f9c94cb7a84e8

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=k1I4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--