Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.192.44 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.192.44;
	envelope-from=martin.habovstiak@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-qg0-f44.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP2xEEO5AzkiBW2PE9SrZ+xmCGHME_-z851Wn1Oqh_DKvw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1422667849.25602.6.camel@TARDIS>
	<CANEZrP2V0+M5B0P3T6cUqmSh-0FTP5_VgNcegwQTQQM7XMfMsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALkkCJav7gQuDuPvWc_SOgVJGyfAorSWGHMvUjUTGZBJcGnNYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP2mv2yNtHN7KWFn6crHT_KhrW-GBB0EmK-BOrJQeEqMrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T2d8ahBo7PC9S5UteHXcVLFtXT7NXjtSS+2sLamQYum1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALkkCJahDRBbCeKZYnL16VXugKkJ7vyZmzvfJOHkBbcqKfGcrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP2xEEO5AzkiBW2PE9SrZ+xmCGHME_-z851Wn1Oqh_DKvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:14:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CALkkCJY+EF7UsRxrkjz0L8-Y9EWGxOS3p8c1+0=c5fvcWwEfTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Habov=C5=A1tiak?= <martin.habovstiak@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature
	payments
Precedence: list

Both wallet and server side implementations will be based on existing
code in me-friendly language (C++>Python>anything else). I don't have
a time for it right now but Crypto hackathon in Parallel Polis
(http://cryptohack.org/) seems like good opportunity for it. I will
let you know then.

2015-02-01 14:43 GMT+01:00 Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>:
> If you decide to implement this in an existing or new bitcoinj based wall=
et,
> then I'm happy to give you pointers on how to do it. Making one-off, cros=
s
> platform app specific wallets is pretty easy these days. For 2-of-3 dispu=
te
> mediation transactions they'd start out being kind of specialist so askin=
g
> people to move money from their general spending wallet into dispute
> mediation app isn't unthinkable. Eventually general purpose wallets would
> integrate protocol, UI ideas and maybe code.
>
> At least, that's how I'd do it.
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Martin Habov=C5=A1tiak
> <martin.habovstiak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I didn't consider that, thank you for feedback! I will try to find
>> some time for implementing it. I'll write again then.
>>
>> 2015-01-31 23:50 GMT+02:00 Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>:
>> > I agree- standards should be descriptive ("here is how this thing I di=
d
>> > works") and NOT proscriptive ("here's what I think will work, lets all
>> > try
>> > to do it this way.").
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I could look at implementing it someday, but now I'd like to receive
>> >>> feedback from community.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> IMO it's better to pair a protocol spec with an implementation.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > --
>> > Gavin Andresen
>
>