Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2lbQ-0003iR-0t for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 18:51:40 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.148.102 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.148.102; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail148102.authsmtp.net; Received: from outmail148102.authsmtp.net ([62.13.148.102]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Y2lbO-0001ZD-Qx for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 18:51:40 +0000 Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237]) by punt14.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id sBLIpUTY074929; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 18:51:30 GMT Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com [75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id sBLIpRbg050806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 21 Dec 2014 18:51:29 GMT Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 13:51:26 -0500 From: Peter Todd To: Adam Back Message-ID: <20141221185126.GC18711@savin.petertodd.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: 60481c26-8942-11e4-9f74-002590a135d3 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aAdMdAMUHFAXAgsB AmIbWlxeVVx7WmM7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr VklWR1pVCwQmQm59 f158AE5ycgVOeHg+ bUZiXz5dXEBydBV/ RFNcHGkEeGZhPWQC WRZfcx5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdiU+ EkooPzcudS5eJyJc XhwXIElaAXwGTHYP bREeFjIuGwgJSjs+ Kxs+L1MaAHNZDkU/ eUEsXVsEMhgUEQ1f ByMFCiJFOFQMQWIT FwRdUwsZHnhlXC1Y AxYhPh5PBHRbXCYQ LU1ZSlQ1BjtBWTgA byxUWSkgFxlB X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1Y2lbO-0001ZD-Qx Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] one-show signatures (Re: The relationship between Proof-of-Publication and Anti-Replay Oracles) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 18:51:40 -0000 --4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 06:10:47PM +0000, Adam Back wrote: > Yes you could for example define a new rule that two signatures > (double-spend) authorises something - eg miners to take funds. (And > this would work with existing ECDSA addresses & unrestricted R-value > choices). >=20 > I wasnt really making a point other than an aside that it maybe is > sort-of possible to do with math what you said was not possible where > you said "This [preventing signing more than one message] is > impossible to implement with math alone". Introducing a bunch of clever ECDSA math doesn't change the fact that the clever math isn't what is preventing double-spending, clever economics is. Just like Bitcoin itself. No sense getting people potentially confused by a bunch of complex equations that aren't relevant to the more fundemental and much more important principle that math alone can't prevent double-spending. --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000001bc21486eb6e305efc085daa6b9acd37305feba64327342e --4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJUlxaqXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwOGJjY2JlNGQyYjgxN2M4MThhNzJjNDBjMzQ3NjFmZGZm OTcwNWVmOWY4ZGVhNTEvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkfsvwgf/QUONliB1i50Bl4DIpDfath8n v4KaiOF8gWQacG1Xnp6VCEcF6BG/czcnzldfxOIwidOc4J25QWgLOZATnhWF4blY pOCKLgtjjxvjv1mH+EFmFzdEhKZ3Uc7cnLhB2Oee/RVEy2XTJXU4qO7t6wtZvL5I R8ugwNHrXJJNl8aX7PvqhpMJsAl0/+hEbdAaAil/ac2lsT04BNs/bt53XWaGbMvn vZYt9SHmaZSoC91IoQp7Ji/2XPIhQMm2rg8qQir0gWe3fc87ntakHYVYOzqjNf5g H7l+Vhf5DN44hv451xDKa1LNG//KoG86firOkmlTx79rZzvdHvdChNpIP4WHqw== =Aa0k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L--