Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAB6C000A for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DC541907 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:00:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jLE9Kvvf14SF for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:00:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B502418ED for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com [209.85.166.49]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jlrubin@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 13GI0fZ7031859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 14:00:41 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id a9so17676550ioc.8 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:00:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UkWVvlMYiqIpiRX2Sf/t+CsUHjRPBBYRKMdsZOidlhBDOqnha udv4hRYtVoJ3G3k30cA03YDRnH+qUqOSCijTE4o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQ1lwQk9C7klcB2d99Z6Mjl2e0nPrwgtt5GsSbdUjNS/nkGJYpPhciuBhcDPCSi8GrmdzTZdpkXowl5aOD+Zo= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8d12:: with SMTP id p18mr4582083ioj.31.1618596041013; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:00:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jeremy Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:00:29 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Christopher Gilliard Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000f3dd705c01ac21b" Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - limiting OP_RETURN / HF X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:00:47 -0000 --0000000000000f3dd705c01ac21b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" For every workaround, someone may have a long lost stash that you'd be confiscating :) https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/90127/why-does-this-coinbase-transaction-have-two-op-return-outputs --0000000000000f3dd705c01ac21b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For every workaround, = someone may have a long lost stash that you'd be confiscating :)
<= div style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:r= gb(0,0,0)" class=3D"gmail_default">

--0000000000000f3dd705c01ac21b--