Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1W81qs-0005av-QJ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:08:50 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net; Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1W81qr-0003bU-My for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:08:50 +0000 Received: from fulvetta.riseup.net (fulvetta-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 956434EFF4; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:08:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: odinn.cyberguerrilla@fulvetta.riseup.net) with ESMTPSA id 2D558281 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) (SquirrelMail authenticated user odinn.cyberguerrilla) by fulvetta.riseup.net with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:08:43 -0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:08:43 -0800 From: "Odinn Cyberguerrilla" To: "Jeff Garzik" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Headers-End: 1W81qr-0003bU-My Cc: Bitcoin Dev , Stephane Brossier , Pierre-Alexandre Meyer Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Extension for BIP-0070 to support recurring payments X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:08:50 -0000 Greatly appreciate seeing this discussion occur. This is something that potentially could be supported through a bounty - possibly a process BIP? Possibly related: https://gist.github.com/ABISprotocol/8515891 > Yes, recurring payments and subscriptions is a frequently-requested > feature. It needs a new BIP. Here is an outline: > > The situation is somewhat analogous to HTML5 local storage. The remote > (merchant) wants to initiate a persistent behavior. This is bitcoin, s= o > we > have a "push" model for payment, and the user has complete control. Th= e > merchant can, at most, send a "subscription request." The user is > responsible for making on-time payments after that point. > > Centralized services like coinbase.com or blockchain.info will have an > easy > time of it. An automated program on their backend, sending payments as > needed, is easy and direct. > > More inventive services might employ multisig transactions, generating = and > signing one signature of a TX, then sending that TX to the human for > further signing and publishing. A few competing vendors could offer bo= ts > that provide this signing service. > > Decentralized, standalone wallet clients will be somewhat troublesome. = We > can store a local subscription request, and send recurring payments... = if > the wallet app is running. If not, the user will be missing payments, > that > perhaps they intended to make (rent!). > > Each of these solutions can be cancelled at any time by the user. As > such, > a courtesy "subscription cancelled" message sent to the merchant is > recommended. User controls the usage of their money at all times, the = way > things should be. > > And finally, you do not want to make it /too easy/ to send money over a= nd > over again. From a human-interface perspective, a textual reminder to > send > money might be preferred over actual recurring payment automation: > reminder > email + manual spend inserts a bit of additional human thought and revi= ew > into the process, with all that entails. > > -- > Jeff Garzik > Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist > BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- > WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable > security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key > security issues and trends. Skip the complicated setup - simply import > a virtual appliance and go from zero to informed in seconds. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D123612991&iu=3D/4140/os= tg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >