Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc74o-00006L-ST for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 05:47:34 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.172; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f172.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f172.google.com ([209.85.213.172]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Wc74o-0002bX-8I for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 05:47:34 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hn18so1459940igb.5 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 22:47:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.74.198 with SMTP id yx6mr28621849icb.40.1398059248922; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 22:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.22.168 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 22:47:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:47:28 +0200 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: Rodney Morris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Wc74o-0002bX-8I Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mailing list abuse X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 05:47:35 -0000 On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Rodney Morris wrote: > What is the procedure for dealing with it? Is it considered abuse to reply > to and quote the entire digest for the sake of a few lines of content? Am I > the only one annoyed by this (if so I'll just shut right up). I would not go as far as calling it 'abuse' if it is not done on purpose. Probably the person doesn't even know he/she is doing this. Best to mail the person and ask (nicely) instead of complaining to the list. Wladimir