Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4946489E for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:29:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4322EA for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igfj19 with SMTP id j19so15488479igf.0 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:29:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=oHVmxaslo6dXG/FMEn5zZ5B+O8HJ0AHd5b/C8RqWoAE=; b=QR/6rRXXyhI4Uy/OYGJYTOj24mMsFdepX0CDjHrcMamY36pIFT4q4bfFRDWc4o+sLZ lYIGc95MMY+AvWFcaFpXGqmZGpDiSp8fpHa9W/ZNvpDIRagFuDpkNALZp2SQ1RTlxfTA 3QNSLWh/+DbWhhMxhE5KELPH3LhrCX9c1/OAT4AyHGQHg3F/WYg5q8iwseD5hAxbFbfp 0aZ7/jY7UPd7tLRNopNSPPAbSpaJcNrN445bYmf+GR0sGFIrBCXVf779YgEQe7X8RsRS 1Ydfvwi9EQTMIUBZdfENzAhttBTEJ/HsV1n+1PtnpYaz8E9Bre2podJOeiMHLQe1AVxi qjUQ== X-Received: by 10.50.66.232 with SMTP id i8mr2266891igt.34.1440156540300; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:29:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.81.199 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:28:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3B2A58B3-6AF6-4F1C-A6FA-7AEC97F48AD0@petertodd.org> From: Btc Drak Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:28:41 +0100 Message-ID: To: Yifu Guo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, HK_RANDOM_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Core Devs : can you share your thoughts about all BIPs on this website ? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:29:01 -0000 On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Yifu Guo via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I like the intend of this attempt to bring more clarity to the blocksize > debate, however it would be more help to make this a information site about > the current outstanding BIPs and summarize their differences rather than > voting mechanism. > (ofcourse the author of the BIPs would "vote" for their own proposals.) > > It would be good to include supporting and counter statements regards to > these BIPs on the site. > in addition to highlight certain things like pools in china have voiced > their opinion that increase should happen, and 8mb is something they are > comfortable with, which is not directly related to a single BIP, but never > the less relevant in this discussion. I was rather surprised by the tweet from AntPool[1] today saying that they support big blocks and would be prepared to upgrade to XT. Pools have stated that they are willing to increase to a maximum of 8MB, but upgrading to XT puts them on a schedule towards 8GB which is clearly not what they have agreed to. Do you have any insights into what's going on there? Also do you have any insight into what Chinese pools would accept as a compromise in terms of raising the blocksize limit? Drak [1] https://twitter.com/JihanWu/status/633288343338381314