Return-Path: <ctpacia@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57E23BDE
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:23:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com (mail-qg0-f44.google.com
	[209.85.192.44])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E44138
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:23:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qgeg89 with SMTP id g89so7961161qge.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=SkWfnWp4c+cl5+yG3wNS/eYhE+NTIDFqvTZr7GF5kAk=;
	b=msm/4vIySeZWHgCXm19Hr19UXzUzh5M5uY6oztn0XmE4IeNDCM/1lugdF3Bl43ODlh
	5Ahz1HFCFCwIjiFktjyJN3epp6WfB0GrQukT9MSwlu8Us+joVl8mCKSfFGTigDQdGBHm
	1lP37CJe8rofTRWSD8UxAAT7MH0H0ufWscobzRLfCLORjQaP9bVIpLpNMzpbWhjw4FRF
	i0u6j3QPQ4G9vXNLtEAEHG7VGfmvifJC8z9f8d/IWPCPWF41BOmCsnDQET33i4aN/D5g
	S42ClDtgFlQIVuLlhOq5rIIv5GC3IkqTRoguBicsPZjpgWPvl6flefoc218zKT4jQBOk
	MTLQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.109.119 with SMTP id k110mr27639379qgf.53.1435688597446; 
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18d:8301:36e:89a9:a6f3:1a88:57a6?
	([2601:18d:8301:36e:89a9:a6f3:1a88:57a6])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 6sm320705qks.37.2015.06.30.11.23.16
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5592DE93.1070002@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:23:15 -0400
From: Chris Pacia <ctpacia@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <20150629050726.GA502@savin.petertodd.org>	<5591E10F.9000008@thinlink.com>	<20150630013736.GA11508@savin.petertodd.org>	<CALqxMTH_5rtOs=aSNiVrfsG_sqQDCnTr-8qBH3Qji+8g_dAMcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150630160523.GG17984@savin.petertodd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150630160523.GG17984@savin.petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee deployment schedule
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:23:19 -0000

On 06/30/2015 12:05 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> Well, as you know I have good reason to believe those contracts are
> being actively worked on right now.
Isn't the whole reason they are working on those contracts because a few
miners don't use first-seen in all circumstances as it is? Or as a
corollary, wouldn't full RBF just create that much more incentive for
those type of contracts?