Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <austin.walne@gmail.com>) id 1XyjSh-0004jh-JW
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:45:59 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.220.46 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.220.46; envelope-from=austin.walne@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-pa0-f46.google.com; 
Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1XyjSg-0003Xg-MQ
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:45:59 +0000
Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id lf10so2411943pab.19
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:45:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.66.163.196 with SMTP id yk4mr7959285pab.57.1418226352265;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:45:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.10.1.3] (198.23.103.82-static.reverse.softlayer.com.
	[198.23.103.82])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id on1sm4601785pdb.32.2014.12.10.07.45.50
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:45:50 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Austin Walne <austin.walne@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B436)
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJA0BDMaa2+A7QJdz08Ck4PFQcXs2dg22hi5PCMsGu7dqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:45:49 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <48E6B6DA-F977-409C-AEDD-53572986438D@gmail.com>
References: <54876653.4020403@certimix.com> <548769FA.5040406@bluematt.me>
	<CA+s+GJAe9MeO+Sr0+2BRwu3q-Be5JQt_s_xdnBBEcquXqOyxcA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+s+GJA0BDMaa2+A7QJdz08Ck4PFQcXs2dg22hi5PCMsGu7dqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(austin.walne[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1XyjSg-0003Xg-MQ
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] ACK NACK utACK "Concept ACK"
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:45:59 -0000

I've had these same questions myself. I'm happy to write up some documentati=
on this afternoon. I can draft something based on this thread. What other ke=
y terminology should be included?

> On Dec 10, 2014, at 00:21, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Abbreviations:
>>=20
>> Concept ACK -> agree with the idea and overall direction, but haven't
>> reviewed the code changes nor tested it
>> utACK -> reviewed the code changes, but did not put it through any testin=
g
>> Tested ACK -> reviewed the code changes and verified the functionality/bu=
g fix
>=20
> And there is also NACK, that's an aspecific 'I wouldn't like this
> merged'. I always explain why in the text.
>=20
> A document on this would be welcome, as it may look like Martian to
> outsiders. That's been brought up many times before, but no one ever
> created it.
>=20
> Wladimir
>=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
> Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
> from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
> with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
> Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D164703151&iu=3D/4140/ostg.=
clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development